IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] draft-cridland-xmpp-session-00

Curtis King <cking@mumbo.ca> Mon, 09 June 2014 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <cking@mumbo.ca>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439CC1A0275 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZMjmII1W6r8F for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from monet.mumbo.ca (monet.mumbo.ca [204.109.63.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE66E1A0274 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rembrandt.mumbo.ca (unknown [184.66.12.24]) by monet.mumbo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27F3C45021; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Curtis King <cking@mumbo.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5395DF40.2030509@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:36:31 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <292F40A9-A302-477B-AF26-57B1D3024BEC@mumbo.ca>
References: <CAKHUCzwJrykJrOscQowXOKZY1Aq7MA+YRWz=XanDknY+7zq6qg@mail.gmail.com> <B97418EC-47DF-439E-85C2-835761F6D694@andyet.net> <5395DF40.2030509@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/Ip_IfJ2ULSH02Mm2h8nqIYqGGBc
Cc: XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] draft-cridland-xmpp-session-00
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:36:37 -0000

On Jun 9, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:

> On 6/9/14, 9:46 AM, Lance Stout wrote:
>> +1 for standardizing this. It's a pragmatic solution that lets us cut out a round-trip during session startup without worrying about older servers.
> 
> +1, seems fine. That was the thinking behind RFC 6121 but it seems that we neglected to make the <optional/> flag explicit.

Instead of adding an redundant flag into the XMPP spec. Why doesn’t this draft state the <optional/> flag explicit and give the session as an example? Otherwise we will be adding <optional/> to more features than session.

ck

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email