Re: [xmpp] WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-02

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 09 June 2014 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D322C1A02A5 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14Eixvk_P4nf for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313151A02A6 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s59IN31m074653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 13:23:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5395DAAE.8090906@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 13:23:01 -0500
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 424030981.694746-60ea410c3fb3d09ca114a20fdf50976e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EE86C568-3777-4F96-8A81-D317ABC25619@nostrum.com>
References: <F8275190-9346-4879-9843-A3DF6C604F8C@nostrum.com> <9372C947-DE5D-4115-B1DD-3E1D216C9D62@nostrum.com> <9D46867E-ADA1-4530-AF23-B43AC6E68B3E@andyet.net> <6322B641-3846-4A62-9BBC-0A8A30F50DE6@nostrum.com> <5384D9E8.5000601@stpeter.im> <6FF542E9-904E-4997-936F-D4C61087179A@nostrum.com> <53921B7C.8080403@stpeter.im> <73438225-60E0-4301-ABD8-7AE8C8C7CDEE@nostrum.com> <0F867757-72F8-4961-9B0C-476F2987652C@andyet.net> <F9FC05B9-5446-41BE-A932-E3F1C3C4FF56@nostrum.com> <78B53C44-9C02-4CB3-9D45-48748CA75F54@andyet.net> <5395DAAE.8090906@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/S1OdnrBA09bXy-vt0CWB6YMu3IQ
Cc: XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-02
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:23:13 -0000

On Jun 9, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:

> On 6/9/14, 9:59 AM, Lance Stout wrote:
>> 
>>> WFM
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Ben.
>> 
>> 
>> Then I think that all WGLC feedback has now been addressed in -07. Next step?
> 
> For my part as the document shepherd, I have reviewed the diff between 06 and 07, and have updated the writeup accordingly:
> 
> https://stpeter.im/files/writeup-ietf-xmpp-websocket.txt
> 
> IMHO we can proceed to WGLC.

Do you mean IETF Last Call? Or do you think we need to repeat the WGLC?

> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp