Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-23: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 09 June 2015 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBE61A90FA;
Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id S_lpxXWt7QGS; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1F11A90F9;
Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbzc4 with SMTP id zc4so16712143igb.0;
Tue, 09 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=Y1fAEcWJNlO4dFOk87CKgK7hGT177Cn9IMIYSEOXlAg=;
b=Av/gPkQO0VRK1UgZ18PSWzLs7qQmQjDjeLmFWcbtkzbwP/jJXREJcLQ0286Nw0Q7md
wVvFXgz8VGchf023FMAohUL+9dGLl8L1BhF9RIsjan+ZWsfLbJXwQ/QTIG9wKaznD+rW
/P+7Qa8Fx/g48THbzZXEqb019YXfuoFFmIn3bazdTYR8qirAyEAAfn75yUfQezWc1DMi
CHGY9mQW12PYgb9GQ6rl0tmNyXdUoaTh8WXaJzQlkSk38o8BS2a+bnr4RDMJdJDlgSdo
p5gF5+bNja/0h3cjIRamDYr51quorYBwUjLvST/5HCawJhnRcK1zuDXwa1R30OezfQ4e
Wm/A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.227 with SMTP id z3mr21509174igl.12.1433868106133;
Tue, 09 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.16.222 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <557705C8.3000306@andyet.net>
References: <20150609110459.26823.80392.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
<557705C8.3000306@andyet.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 17:41:46 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VG_XvnHAxF2Td6MiF_EBww2MrVs
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+hMRXMjVW76YQK9_5wsc1yK=K07QLsW94s26D3Mvo-XA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Peter Saint-Andre - &yet" <peter@andyet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/UgJzuAOx0ejGsGyw0e6M28ll-I8>
Cc: xmpp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis@ietf.org, xmpp@ietf.org,
draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis.ad@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>,
draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-23: (with
COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>,
<mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>,
<mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 16:41:47 -0000
Hi, Peter; thanks for the response. > OLD > The domainpart of a JID is that portion which remains once any > portion from the first '/' character to the end of the string has > been removed (if there is a '/' character present), and then any > portion from the beginning of the string to the first '@' character > (if there is a '@' character present). > > NEW > The domainpart of a JID is that portion which remains once the > following parsing steps are taken: > > 1. Remove any portion from the first '/' character to the end of the > string (if there is a '/' character present). > > 2. Remove any portion from the beginning of the string to the first > '@' character (if there is a '@' character present). > > This parsing order is important, as illustrated by example 15 in > Section 3.5. Nice; thanks. >> In Section 3.3.1, I find the "i.e."s to be distracting clutter, and >> mildly recommend rendering those lines like this: >> >> U+0022 (QUOTATION MARK): " >> U+0026 (AMPERSAND): & > > This might be confusing... > > U+003A (COLON): : Ah, true. > So I'll change the order to: > > " U+0022 (QUOTATION MARK) > & U+0026 (AMPERSAND) > ' U+0027 (APOSTROPHE) > / U+002F (SOLIDUS) > : U+003A (COLON) > < U+003C (LESS-THAN SIGN) > > U+003E (GREATER-THAN SIGN) > @ U+0040 (COMMERCIAL AT) Yes, that's a good way to handle it. b
- [xmpp] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-xmpp-6122b… Barry Leiba
- Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-xmpp-6… Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-xmpp-6… Barry Leiba