Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-23: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 09 June 2015 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBE61A90FA; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S_lpxXWt7QGS; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1F11A90F9; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbzc4 with SMTP id zc4so16712143igb.0; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Y1fAEcWJNlO4dFOk87CKgK7hGT177Cn9IMIYSEOXlAg=; b=Av/gPkQO0VRK1UgZ18PSWzLs7qQmQjDjeLmFWcbtkzbwP/jJXREJcLQ0286Nw0Q7md wVvFXgz8VGchf023FMAohUL+9dGLl8L1BhF9RIsjan+ZWsfLbJXwQ/QTIG9wKaznD+rW /P+7Qa8Fx/g48THbzZXEqb019YXfuoFFmIn3bazdTYR8qirAyEAAfn75yUfQezWc1DMi CHGY9mQW12PYgb9GQ6rl0tmNyXdUoaTh8WXaJzQlkSk38o8BS2a+bnr4RDMJdJDlgSdo p5gF5+bNja/0h3cjIRamDYr51quorYBwUjLvST/5HCawJhnRcK1zuDXwa1R30OezfQ4e Wm/A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.227 with SMTP id z3mr21509174igl.12.1433868106133; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.16.222 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <557705C8.3000306@andyet.net>
References: <20150609110459.26823.80392.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <557705C8.3000306@andyet.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 17:41:46 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VG_XvnHAxF2Td6MiF_EBww2MrVs
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+hMRXMjVW76YQK9_5wsc1yK=K07QLsW94s26D3Mvo-XA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Peter Saint-Andre - &yet" <peter@andyet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/UgJzuAOx0ejGsGyw0e6M28ll-I8>
Cc: xmpp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis@ietf.org, xmpp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis.ad@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-23: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 16:41:47 -0000

Hi, Peter; thanks for the response.

> OLD
>    The domainpart of a JID is that portion which remains once any
>    portion from the first '/' character to the end of the string has
>    been removed (if there is a '/' character present), and then any
>    portion from the beginning of the string to the first '@' character
>    (if there is a '@' character present).
>
> NEW
>    The domainpart of a JID is that portion which remains once the
>    following parsing steps are taken:
>
>    1.  Remove any portion from the first '/' character to the end of the
>        string (if there is a '/' character present).
>
>    2.  Remove any portion from the beginning of the string to the first
>        '@' character (if there is a '@' character present).
>
>    This parsing order is important, as illustrated by example 15 in
>    Section 3.5.

Nice; thanks.

>> In Section 3.3.1, I find the "i.e."s to be distracting clutter, and
>> mildly recommend rendering those lines like this:
>>
>>        U+0022 (QUOTATION MARK): "
>>        U+0026 (AMPERSAND): &
>
> This might be confusing...
>
> U+003A (COLON): :

Ah, true.

> So I'll change the order to:
>
>       " U+0022 (QUOTATION MARK)
>       & U+0026 (AMPERSAND)
>       ' U+0027 (APOSTROPHE)
>       / U+002F (SOLIDUS)
>       : U+003A (COLON)
>       < U+003C (LESS-THAN SIGN)
>       > U+003E (GREATER-THAN SIGN)
>       @ U+0040 (COMMERCIAL AT)

Yes, that's a good way to handle it.

b