Re: [xmpp] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Wed, 24 June 2015 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD971B2E73 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i4j2aQMEZXkZ for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367A31B2E72 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iebrt9 with SMTP id rt9so42428245ieb.2 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5oKq1gvb8ZMPYwGMfBYpRC6YJQhJ/7VQUQSNIjcz4NY=; b=FvsF3iJbqgX4dI/pbDyAxVFgyMq5v9+4P4b1REOF3LoshpyTQckjUsZrbEkLgJbPnH MfURsbGNm6xlMZHm6JnjhZNF42/YkCJKpfuqsR7HAh+zCn6ZSLgPZ1BLhYaYQeG+6Q0V aGWzI7CzUBg7TrUR31I0GX5reYyA3DZftgyea0zPn1kgw1qYZzv0EXkW4aKKNarHHjop ts/3OK4iBzLk5KzeI8/TnxW87RK3I7/ZDlHBQrRTB2rC1oLRZwr3901NAqaf/WWptAwt /UnVu6ujixHONqIcJmAzZ5STReL3fxYj3FoQ5l/CjY2U5yAN3WYuAGKx3kCeQXYCmZ4Z IoKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkjPD/GZr6IyEKm7oU39iK2Y9lfPDAtgJW+flQo11J09j7XMa9U/axobBOaYx0ePFjfQ72g
X-Received: by 10.107.134.214 with SMTP id q83mr38540633ioi.91.1435182557647; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local ([2601:282:4201:ef5b:7dc6:738e:73e4:2f00]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u38sm18179484ioi.0.2015.06.24.14.49.16 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <558B25DB.4090501@andyet.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:49:15 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, draft-ietf-xmpp-posh.all@tools.ietf.org, XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
References: <86E041F3-A90D-45E6-945E-3BAC592F8E58@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <86E041F3-A90D-45E6-945E-3BAC592F8E58@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/YPXiNhapn6wzbdY-XjYOiwWJciA>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:49:19 -0000

On 6/24/15 2:41 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04. There's nothing
> here to block last call.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben.
>
> --------
>
> -- section 3, first paragraph after first numbered list: " ... server
> proves it identity ..."
>
> s/it/its

Noted.

> -- 8, last sentence
>
> With this one sentence, you've made the entire introduction serve as a
> shaggy dog story, without detracting from its main purpose. Bravo. Also,
> groan :-)

We couldn't resist. ;-)

> -- References:
>
> IDNits turns up several outdated references that probably need attention
> before final publication.

Indeed. Several of the cited documents have undergone revisions since 
February, and draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning is now RFC 7469

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/