Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10: (with COMMENT)

[Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <[e-mail]>]

On 7/29/15 3:46 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xmpp-dna/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Apart from the ".well-known" issue brought up in my comments to
> xmpp-posh, I have only one, tiny comment here:
>
> -- Section 1 --
>
>     If such delegation is not done in
>     a secure manner, then the domain name association cannot be verified.
>
> Really small point: many people find these sorts of negative-negative
> constructions to be confusing, so I suggest this:
>
> NEW
>     The domain name association can only be verified when the delegation
>     is done in a secure manner.
> END

Good point. I agree that such double negatives are the sort of 
construction up with which we shall not put. :-)

Peter