Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10: (with COMMENT)

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Thu, 30 July 2015 23:57 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DE21B2C27 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bNmk_ZEDpeg9 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1474A1B2B11 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iodd187 with SMTP id d187so69700494iod.2 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IhCAk9sfcx8QOG4z3Qx+GRl+2BcRVbJ0ZxjQVLS1Bbk=; b=BgfjwvBXADyYb1bnLRVpK7A+s78zsw/HrH9S8LZJTwcY+llrFegFC10GA/qi4Fr9H3 S4YgTfKBPc3BC6XcD6Oprpp4bv41sjpkQG1bq9AK3Kus3lC4wD0C1WWkuPFbNEjtp4l2 3cgt0xlJ2jn4HBzmsB1xUrwlK+wH6qevvBQ+uDhVsJrSpnY1WYYcTy00R1cLJfi5WcPV Ce1zVEnoK/4SM7pV6MCNQdsz0kqN4/ocyMcLu8BXUIMO8v+2qQAyR8lNsMg3L9MgBYvp V5DGuyTCHaQd7J+6LWNvMSBeFaGGjuWc8Dj+ecWIbV+vb3f2Jxnvn/YhYMOa/CRxk4VN v1qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlkngwSfU3ifV1AQe34QAPo3ZL2exYBKCB6aIo/fx0M+9i7PidPOnzcBZ6XOioSBR+tqZc8
X-Received: by 10.107.19.206 with SMTP id 75mr14170592iot.191.1438300632427; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local ([2601:282:4201:ef5b:911:7b2:8aa2:8931]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm859329igl.17.2015.07.30.16.57.09 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150729094616.18053.7103.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
Message-ID: <55BAB9D3.2050600@andyet.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:57:07 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150729094616.18053.7103.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/egaQJsEEVw-TLA1hP5fD1sMEV6c>
Cc: draft-ietf-xmpp-dna.ad@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-dna@ietf.org, xmpp-chairs@ietf.org, xmpp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-dna.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:57:55 -0000

On 7/29/15 3:46 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xmpp-dna/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Apart from the ".well-known" issue brought up in my comments to
> xmpp-posh, I have only one, tiny comment here:
>
> -- Section 1 --
>
>     If such delegation is not done in
>     a secure manner, then the domain name association cannot be verified.
>
> Really small point: many people find these sorts of negative-negative
> constructions to be confusing, so I suggest this:
>
> NEW
>     The domain name association can only be verified when the delegation
>     is done in a secure manner.
> END

Good point. I agree that such double negatives are the sort of 
construction up with which we shall not put. :-)

Peter