Re: [xmpp] XMPP Completes

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Sat, 12 September 2015 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CA11B4A58 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 14:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuslYmrYt6GJ for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 14:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19231A1A78 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 14:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t8CLL6Q8018744 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:21:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:21:05 -0500
Message-ID: <D44C39F2-A675-497C-A2D0-7CE2FE39253B@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <55F47E48.3090003@zash.se>
References: <241FC222-01CD-47DB-ACD8-04A665C8BAFD@nostrum.com> <55F47E48.3090003@zash.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5107)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/fxF36rByglk-yH_61j7CW2nd8so>
Cc: xmpp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xmpp] XMPP Completes
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:21:18 -0000

Certainly. If we find momentum to work on e2e xmpp crypto in the IETF, 
we will find or make a place to do the work, whether that means 
restarting the working group or something else.

Thanks for reminding us :-)

Ben.



On 12 Sep 2015, at 14:34, Kim Alvefur wrote:

> Hi!
>
> With the WG closing, I'd like to draw some attention to the dropped
> end-to-end encryption goal, as a wild ProtoXEP appeared:
>
> http://conversations.im/omemo/
>
> -- 
> Kim "Zash" Alvefur
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp