Re: [xmpp] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22

[Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <[e-mail]>]

On 5/20/15 9:05 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> On 20 May 2015, at 17:16, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
>
>> On 5/20/15 2:29 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is my AD evaluation of draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22. I think this is
>>> ready for IETF last call, and will start that shortly.
>>
>> Thanks, Ben.
>>
>>> I have only one comment of any substance:
>>>
>>> -- section 3.1, 4 paragraphs from the end makes normative statements
>>> about the minimum and maximum length for each part of a JID. But the
>>> sections for each part repeat those statements, creating redundant
>>> normative language. I don't see disagreements between the sections, but
>>> it would still be better to avoid the redundancy.
>>
>> How about this change to remove the normative statement in §3.1?
>>
>> OLD
>>  Each allowable portion of a JID (localpart, domainpart, and
>>  resourcepart) MUST NOT be zero octets in length and MUST NOT be more
>>  than 1023 octets in length, resulting in a maximum total size
>>  (including the '@' and '/' separators) of 3071 octets.
>>
>> NEW
>>  Each allowable portion of a JID (localpart, domainpart, and
>>  resourcepart) is from 1 to 1023 octets in length, resulting in a
>>  maximum total size (including the '@' and '/' separators) of 3071
>>  octets.
>>
>
> That WFM. I suggest dealing with that when you deal with any IETF last
> call feedback.

Ack. Will do.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/