Re: [xmpp] WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-02

Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de> Sat, 25 October 2014 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8771A86E6 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 01:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IKfMZb2TVMxI for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 01:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (lost.in.psyced.org [188.40.42.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9159C1A8547 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 01:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.45] (p5DCFDE85.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.207.222.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id s9P8GLcx018481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 10:16:23 +0200
Message-ID: <544B5C48.6070107@goodadvice.pages.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 10:16:08 +0200
From: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: xmpp@ietf.org
References: <E2E3603E-F48C-4853-AF15-3F6EE0A64510@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <E2E3603E-F48C-4853-AF15-3F6EE0A64510@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/psA_UZeba2avynkjctZ617OV9NY
Cc: draft-ietf-xmpp-posh.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xmpp] WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-02
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 08:16:26 -0000

Am 14.10.2014 01:17, schrieb Ben Campbell:
> (Oops, messed up the authors' address the first time. Apologies for the duplicate.)
>
> This is a Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-02. The draft is available at the following URL:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-02
>
> The WGLC will conclude on 27 October, 2014. Please send your comments to the authors and the XMPP mailing list.

minor editorial stuff:
 > While this approach was developed for use in the Extensible
 > Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) as a Domain Name
 > Association prooftype, it can be applied to any non-HTTP

"Domain Name Association (DNA) prooftype" (as done at the end of the 
introduction)?

section 1:
 > The product managers in your company are pushing you

bugging you? :-)

section 3.2:
 > The client performs an HTTPS GET for the URL

HTTPS GET _request_ for the URL?