Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 28 August 2015 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116D21A1A11; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WH-ePwvGFOmu; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407731A0083; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t7SFcTbx033774 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:38:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:38:29 -0500
Message-ID: <8CC458C6-2460-4075-8F0F-DE54B97B134C@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJL1XtCpaki-tjWcNGSRpPcP-PGK5mubxWmHJD+zpJvGNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150729090441.16993.2639.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55BACBBF.3060301@andyet.net> <CALaySJ+k6Pt6b6UvhKNYgsk+=nMRfiSocd_T8aatRvLq4Vg+-w@mail.gmail.com> <55BBA4C1.6040404@andyet.net> <CALaySJLWDfRuCdziHSKqPFJ136d3O45Z7JDnYzDfQEZsKUsfdA@mail.gmail.com> <55CA9A10.2080603@andyet.net> <C4930219-3403-4782-869B-2348A7BFBEEB@nostrum.com> <55D3B0D8.2010202@andyet.net> <37FFCBB4-6921-4A6C-91A4-D1569CD96381@nostrum.com> <55DBAE21.3020408@cisco.com> <8C4C868A-B232-4F2B-A6D3-980785C95DB8@nostrum.com> <55DD249A.4080109@andyet.net> <55DFE8C4.7090707@andyet.net> <CALaySJJJP3xNPCW2t5XvN3_W5Rv3jsybiqYme+mhP0+oy7uEqA@mail.gmail.com> <BAAB87F2-319A-4658-823F-429F7718D6E3@nostrum.com> <CALaySJJdyV1XefB_9rh8Ty8Jn_oQF3Gj0NKEgh6RqfGPY0j98w@mail.gmail.com> <65E92DD7-E2D2-473C-B67A-70B6B6230BDA@nostrum.com> <CALaySJL1XtCpaki-tjWcNGSRpPcP-PGK5mubxWmHJD+zpJvGNg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5107)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/reJ2OMh1-wuiQFBr4Y8eb9xouts>
Cc: draft-ietf-xmpp-posh.shepherd@ietf.org, xmpp-chairs@ietf.org, xmpp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-posh.ad@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-posh@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:38:44 -0000

On 28 Aug 2015, at 10:22, Barry Leiba wrote:

>> For what it's worth, the comment also applied to the prior paragraph 
>> (to the
>> effect that registration requests should be sent to a designated 
>> mailing
>> list.).
>
> That's been a common thing in many app-related registries, to allow
> the community to participate in the process and comment.  It's been a
> useful way for people making requests to get feedback, not just from
> the DEs.
>

I'm happy with that in principle, but do we expect _IANA_ to send to the 
mailing list vs directly to designated experts? Will that list be 
limited to approved designated experts? Is the list for people to get 
early advice on registrations before they go to IANA?

(I'm sure this has all been worked out for other app-related registries. 
I just don't know the answers.)

> Barry