Re: [xmpp] [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Tue, 08 July 2014 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD401B2B18 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fP5fz5OgNXPy for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DF4F1B2B1A for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n16so6577197oag.6 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Zn1qEgnSxc04mu1NE/oEPpDUmDADe9w6pQtJBfqANzk=; b=DNZ9w5Obq6KqDvsnk6yUZxqvbo326OUiImJpNKQYWoPPEs9k13HkBF4Msf7D98uCPe sfycUiEMcBPYlruNQlJ0sqAlcquGlCYMVyJkjJTZXldkgUSGXDDY/tR+y21VbNlOv/bL fzCaIEeymBiaut2Wz2gO9dROdGhV+Y8+jqu4I=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Zn1qEgnSxc04mu1NE/oEPpDUmDADe9w6pQtJBfqANzk=; b=VOnevem9lHI0edBmI2uvcJwz33KzWJu3nJ906vnvZFhqjrOjANDG9Aga1WokXZoaY4 6OG48EVJV3XBbwMavW1l/SLyCoRWD/pZRET2/VD93YwasUqJgOKTlp3b9SppmBExEI6R qVrsJOjlIbBFXFZB0cedB1hyxR92joh5gqlerUC6Lh/fIgATAIxWCLQsYVylvDAA3mx+ DB5h2ifWgEsobNKrcY3zMs8fDX7uCr8MyYCgSF+EXeBWmWX31Cx0q0lBKxiBUacNiU7/ 1CwAy/+j/Uw22fr7mg68db1nxdF0xXuae98+UAznN8vBUO5a046ai2VJqTVD37kQKJ+p Gtgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn68LsAdqnddgQSD8TvRolRfQlUD6ErMHOPBqXPbr2loriyEJfbiRBb+0uqAqTeF23Ur3A0
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.71.71 with SMTP id s7mr17249050obu.71.1404833423934; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 08:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.134.145 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C836AB4@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C823BB2@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <7CC08F3C-4747-4B65-9743-A19CDAE9F940@piuha.net> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C836AB4@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:30:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzx_2RLQN52Aj3esHmAeqVO31Nxe9rP3jN6zqcmoPQx=Yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1f22a33dd8d04fdb0450e
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/sb12bTpC354b70Y9ukmT13nlNLI
Cc: "draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "xmpp@ietf.org" <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 15:30:26 -0000

On 8 July 2014 10:06, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

> Hi Jari,
>
> The authors actually responded - see
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg10306.html.
>
> They pushed back on my #1 - I am still not convinced by their argument (as
> the protocol does change by adding a different mapping) but I would not
> block the document for this purpose.
> The proposed changes for the rest are fine.
>

I genuinely don't understand why adding an additional binding should
require an Updates.

I understand "Updates" to be an indicator that implementors of (in this
case) RFC 6120 would need to read this document as well, and I don't
believe that to be the case.

In particular, implementors of RFC 6120 don't need to care about this
document unless they *also* want to do XMPP over Websockets, in the same
way that implementors of Websockets don't need to care about this document
unless they *also* want to send XMPP over them.

Of course, readers of this document are required to read both RFC 6120 and
the Websockets spec, but that's what Normative References are for.

Dave.