Re: [xmpp] IQ Handling vulnerabilities

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 10 February 2014 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5CC1A06DC for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:38:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4n5pxWhsx0zp for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:38:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CA81A0882 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:38:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [24.8.129.242]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD3654032A; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:38:23 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <52F9007F.3010108@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:38:23 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ashley Ward <ashley.ward@surevine.com>, XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
References: <CAOb_FnxS-dMT85N7LHj5M9JWk3pL85=ugrDqaT7j5d28HBr0Cw@mail.gmail.com> <CF194491.38AD3%jhildebr@cisco.com> <2F5E925F-021D-408E-91D9-3CC5BEB6BEC6@nostrum.com> <48F4D361-4403-47E6-862D-FBDDDEBCC642@xnyhps.nl> <CF1A369C.38BE2%jhildebr@cisco.com> <CAKHUCzyCwKbmnUoXLHW=XzYbiFrcg-dQsDojGUnA-_r3qK+_Vg@mail.gmail.com> <12420410-2615-4A32-8998-AFF19D4EF7BC@xnyhps.nl> <CAKHUCzw6r4vZOHmLm62YgQAj72EjiXbqc8ZShC4=pJ5gxff31w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOb_FnybyUd69ayMPiLZd1i1n4=cnPA6NB-d3BqguSRH3cJLtA@mail.gmail.com> <A5EDDD45-EADA-43D8-B1C8-80C72F1C4AAC@xnyhps.nl> <AF865786-93A0-4B77-AAE9-34A40DC72181@surevine.com>
In-Reply-To: <AF865786-93A0-4B77-AAE9-34A40DC72181@surevine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [xmpp] IQ Handling vulnerabilities
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:38:26 -0000

On 2/10/14, 6:05 AM, Ashley Ward wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2014, at 12:12, Thijs Alkemade <thijs@xnyhps.nl> wrote:
>> I’ve submitted an I-D about this issue here, to help discussion at IETF 89:
>>
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alkemade-xmpp-iq-validation/
>
> Just wondering if it's possible to use a stronger section title than “Recommendations”, or is that standard IETF I-D heading wording?

We can call it whatever we want. :-)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/