Re: [xmpp] draft-cridland-xmpp-session-00

Lance Stout <lance@andyet.net> Tue, 10 June 2014 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lance@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F8E1A04B8 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_62=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xb5wey85fJMt for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com [209.85.220.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848961A0325 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id lf10so434186pab.1 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=iUfw++JgGYVNb111Oy3VApECV39jxUGvR6vK5Z7j4Ps=; b=jSGaD7omrpRonV404FciK2pAQdI0Ymlim7mEKRY4cFQ0ys7/EP+V6BMlmrEWUUfaJR xzoiBZpQCwH8rIGXxIbFxu4ID92bED88yMmCNJPolH2JNdhcQIiSxR28E6gm9M4OMoP2 MA2rGNmssoR90HVO3uqPnhvfLnQm7Xv/i9HUuWz/iDjd+rX6l/Lbc3RfmP0OAoWWbZUP UOxB/6LnstqqW4yHPhKsZPJAI5MsEsLxVIX155f8nAPLYYZYKpat6Tv3JYPReLU+oBaM RO0c5bWN7/iqslodRndR7fbxd35QEvmNO4XaCtYXvdJPysXiGmj5xGnoS3nNMsPqCSfa +8ow==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRt4NDZZtRUcyoPh4/t794zA5hbay4ylGCSFtM4Dtk0QjvNUF3q7eXAJOmHaB/HKg3rNz5
X-Received: by 10.68.254.70 with SMTP id ag6mr9981832pbd.33.1402387021144; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.172] (68-186-83-170.dhcp.knwc.wa.charter.com. [68.186.83.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id no9sm67882356pbc.83.2014.06.10.00.56.59 for <xmpp@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lance Stout <lance@andyet.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8C28DB0D-6A00-4555-83DE-93D6E66F74DF"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
Message-Id: <059DEECD-D00B-4480-81DE-B66EAFDF5475@andyet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:56:58 -0700
References: <CAKHUCzwJrykJrOscQowXOKZY1Aq7MA+YRWz=XanDknY+7zq6qg@mail.gmail.com> <B97418EC-47DF-439E-85C2-835761F6D694@andyet.net> <5395DF40.2030509@stpeter.im> <292F40A9-A302-477B-AF26-57B1D3024BEC@mumbo.ca> <CAKHUCzyoB04UM63afZctwsCTRKCs=WJ_DjSZrS4Vw8w3iqUarg@mail.gmail.com> <557B118B-21BE-43FD-905A-9B725836E66F@mumbo.ca> <CAKHUCzyamFr6LAk0B+fkdvFg7hoapakNj0bJ9yKPFTd3sET52Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzyamFr6LAk0B+fkdvFg7hoapakNj0bJ9yKPFTd3sET52Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/wggaJi50HnPEMv3I-mOrmDnSDMk
Subject: Re: [xmpp] draft-cridland-xmpp-session-00
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:57:03 -0000

On Jun 10, 2014, at 12:43 AM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:

> I'm just documenting the status quo as deployed.


Coincidentally, I added support in stanza.io for the <optional/> flag the day before this I-D showed up, based on what Prosody does.

So there are both server and client implementations for this approach, as documented.


— Lance