Re: [xmpp] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

On 20 May 2015, at 17:16, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:

> On 5/20/15 2:29 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is my AD evaluation of draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22. I think this 
>> is
>> ready for IETF last call, and will start that shortly.
>
> Thanks, Ben.
>
>> I have only one comment of any substance:
>>
>> -- section 3.1, 4 paragraphs from the end makes normative statements
>> about the minimum and maximum length for each part of a JID. But the
>> sections for each part repeat those statements, creating redundant
>> normative language. I don't see disagreements between the sections, 
>> but
>> it would still be better to avoid the redundancy.
>
> How about this change to remove the normative statement in §3.1?
>
> OLD
>  Each allowable portion of a JID (localpart, domainpart, and
>  resourcepart) MUST NOT be zero octets in length and MUST NOT be more
>  than 1023 octets in length, resulting in a maximum total size
>  (including the '@' and '/' separators) of 3071 octets.
>
> NEW
>  Each allowable portion of a JID (localpart, domainpart, and
>  resourcepart) is from 1 to 1023 octets in length, resulting in a
>  maximum total size (including the '@' and '/' separators) of 3071
>  octets.
>

That WFM. I suggest dealing with that when you deal with any IETF last 
call feedback.

Thanks!

Ben.