Re: [xmpp] WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-02

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 09 June 2014 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A5E1A02BF for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32BRpEdPARma for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B151A02B9 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [24.8.129.242]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4301F40C58; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 12:43:34 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <53960056.5080509@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:43:34 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
References: <F8275190-9346-4879-9843-A3DF6C604F8C@nostrum.com> <9372C947-DE5D-4115-B1DD-3E1D216C9D62@nostrum.com> <9D46867E-ADA1-4530-AF23-B43AC6E68B3E@andyet.net> <6322B641-3846-4A62-9BBC-0A8A30F50DE6@nostrum.com> <5384D9E8.5000601@stpeter.im> <6FF542E9-904E-4997-936F-D4C61087179A@nostrum.com> <53921B7C.8080403@stpeter.im> <73438225-60E0-4301-ABD8-7AE8C8C7CDEE@nostrum.com> <0F867757-72F8-4961-9B0C-476F2987652C@andyet.net> <F9FC05B9-5446-41BE-A932-E3F1C3C4FF56@nostrum.com> <78B53C44-9C02-4CB3-9D45-48748CA75F54@andyet.net> <5395DAAE.8090906@stpeter.im> <EE86C568-3777-4F96-8A81-D317ABC25619@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <EE86C568-3777-4F96-8A81-D317ABC25619@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/xj4z3RS66jLk3BIb_7a8thw_Gyc
Cc: XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-02
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:43:38 -0000

On 6/9/14, 12:23 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>
>> On 6/9/14, 9:59 AM, Lance Stout wrote:
>>>
>>>> WFM
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Ben.
>>>
>>>
>>> Then I think that all WGLC feedback has now been addressed in -07. Next step?
>>
>> For my part as the document shepherd, I have reviewed the diff between 06 and 07, and have updated the writeup accordingly:
>>
>> https://stpeter.im/files/writeup-ietf-xmpp-websocket.txt
>>
>> IMHO we can proceed to WGLC.
>
> Do you mean IETF Last Call? Or do you think we need to repeat the WGLC?

IETF. It's hard to keep track of which drafts are in which states. :-)