Re: [xmpp] [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Tue, 08 July 2014 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0072E1A0251 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b2kXNPh0-Q75 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com (mail-oa0-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF2E1A049C for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m1so985240oag.33 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 11:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TBqYVHsGRmlPEccAWaQsfo10l+dVJmpT9hfXeJBj+mc=; b=cwPjyO4mth6/NozLxqLLmyh5TSIy1Ii3lFpw2BmKIJ3xpBOKxF3mS01t0MwdI/NECs /gke8+hgprqXpAgwV/B10gIA7FEWf/TSYvn1LCD+i6zPu3PC6o/1et8FIHVfWsXdeaAM iTt/E3rwSGCZmkSz3Y9wDEgZfN0k30BfONmIaFVk2BMbcYPVTJhPwrV5PdVYtF4AVHjn Ssd/gOJgL9SFH4B+G6KyZ//e2iJkmd10mTSuQtU2VOgbAPcEpc6cfFpoEyJb9kbaFNRv E60q9G9evUtIngZ98ths8zKdbLDtT1PzU8R796+3pmaeQhOfvzfHswZr0tiYtBj3Fn6L A/gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCTm0tAwdIDQer2e+u7zv2PUEo38+HU7Jng+K6bSyzg12SdzNNhnNWl7Hb8ocvbx/PmBUZ
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.214.98 with SMTP id nz2mr41224621obc.62.1404845925050; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 11:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.143.131 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzwjsT+p+Frb+1vfOx=BXhAVUm3tG6VfpYikeY1pGp8aew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C823BB2@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <7CC08F3C-4747-4B65-9743-A19CDAE9F940@piuha.net> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C836AB4@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <CAKHUCzx_2RLQN52Aj3esHmAeqVO31Nxe9rP3jN6zqcmoPQx=Yg@mail.gmail.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C838783@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <CAKHUCzwjsT+p+Frb+1vfOx=BXhAVUm3tG6VfpYikeY1pGp8aew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:58:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTiM0Jnk8MdEud5kdxsg05nR-zGtsuN6g+knMr0ObyDDw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1cefe53c09504fdb32e06
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/yBFeQUb5s-VyHdiyjtjtj6ZdGkc
Cc: "draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket.all@tools.ietf.org>, "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "xmpp@ietf.org" <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 18:58:48 -0000

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:

> On 8 July 2014 16:49, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Dave,
>>
>>
>>
>> An implementor of RFC 6120 does not know that the XMPP over Websockets
>> binding option exists at all. It did not exist by the time 6120 was
>> written, so of course, they can do without it. Now that the binding exist,
>> the option should be visible IMO.
>>
>>
>>
> OK, but why is this case different to, for example, an IMAP extension,
> where we don't say "Updates: 3501" every time - indeed, qresync got serious
> push-back over the Updates there.
>

I agree.  This document does not update RFC 6120.  If an implementation of
RFC 6120 does not support this transport, then it will never need to know
about the framing changes.  If it does, then it will.  The two are
separate.

"Updates" is not a mechanism for advertising additional features.

--Richard



>
> Dave.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp
>
>