[xmpp] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 20 May 2015 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86F51A923E for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 14:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4CjjsLTilGTf for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 14:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 933F41A923B for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 14:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t4KLTSiG056051 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 May 2015 16:29:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis.all@tools.ietf.org, "XMPP Working Group" <xmpp@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:29:28 -0500
Message-ID: <D8B2E121-7136-4075-A2DC-897082E0E5BC@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/yqoXqF2eyMWpPK1swsNqlnZ57bk>
Subject: [xmpp] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:29:40 -0000

Hi,

This is my AD evaluation of draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22. I think this is 
ready for IETF last call, and will start that shortly.

I have only one comment of any substance:

-- section 3.1, 4 paragraphs from the end makes normative statements 
about the minimum and maximum length for each part of a JID. But the 
sections for each part repeat those statements, creating redundant 
normative language. I don't see disagreements between the sections, but 
it would still be better to avoid the redundancy.

Thanks!

Ben.