Re: [xrblock] WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Tue, 11 June 2013 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F85021F86AE for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X7XwDTJlY8Qp for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [93.93.130.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D93621F8EAD for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.209.247.112] (port=49848 helo=mangole.dcs.gla.ac.uk) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1UmR0l-0008PI-Cc; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:01:31 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FFE5264-C78F-4B45-BE8B-4EB649FD91EE@ntt-at.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:01:30 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <578DC4BF-7282-4BBB-BA92-CCC7B29F0D7C@csperkins.org>
References: <4FFE5264-C78F-4B45-BE8B-4EB649FD91EE@ntt-at.com>
To: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -28
X-Mythic-Debug: Threshold = On =
Cc: xrblock-chairs <xrblock-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:01:45 -0000

Shida,

I've read the draft, and believe it's in reasonable shape to progress. I would be interested in hearing the authors' rationale for choosing ms as the measurement unit rather than RTP timestamp units, however. It would seem that there might be an argument for using RTP timestamp units, so the reports can exactly line-up with the audio data in the RTP packets.

Colin



On 29 May 2013, at 17:53, Shida Schubert wrote:
> This is an announcement of a 2 weeks XRBLOCK WG last call on 
> "Report Block for Concealment metrics Reporting on Audio Applications" 
> prior to requesting publication of the document as a proposed standard. 
> 
> As per discussion at the last meeting, we are running a second 
> WGLC on this draft.
> 
> Please send your comments, including nits, to the list by the
> 
> 12th of June
> 
> If you read the draft and you see no issues, concerns, or nits, please
> express the fact that you have no issue progressing the draft on the
> list as well. 
> 
> The latest version can be found here:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05
> 
> Regards
> 
> Shida as co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock



-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/