IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics

"Zhenghui (Marvin)" <marvin.zhenghui@huawei.com> Tue, 22 November 2016 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <marvin.zhenghui@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172CF129C50 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 01:29:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVRmeQE56z0R for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 01:29:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D2D129C1E for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 01:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DBD08114; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEML425-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.180) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:36 +0000
Received: from SZXEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.79]) by szxeml425-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.180]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:29:34 +0800
From: "Zhenghui (Marvin)" <marvin.zhenghui@huawei.com>
To: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics
Thread-Index: AQHSPxFJ20M4gJZwC0uSZgoGZ/DqdKDbMrMAgAmSzBA=
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:34 +0000
Message-ID: <F8F4995E43962F4996B280E9678CED00B93EC7@szxeml512-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB870553BF@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB870553BF@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.135.87.2]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F8F4995E43962F4996B280E9678CED00B93EC7szxeml512mbschina_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.58341002.0075, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.8.79, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: e26c0c57a7806664e1971eca86dbc880
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/02D8N_hwjg_BIEk-8uW5ggRhTPY>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:43 -0000

Hello,

Just reviewed this document, looks good as far as I’m concerned, except for some trivial problems:


1)       Found a typo “mechianism” as in section 3 paragraph 3, “Without the support of RTCP XRs or some other signaling  mechianism,”

2)       Better to give full name when first time “MoS” is used.


Best Regards,
Zhenghui (Marvin)



发件人: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Shida Schubert
发送时间: 2016年11月15日 15:24
收件人: Shida Schubert
抄送: xrblock
主题: [xrblock] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics

All,


I am going to attempt to recruit some reviewers at the IETF this week for our last draft in the milestone.

With the hope that I am going to get some reviewers :), I am extending the last call for another 2 weeks ending on Nov 29th.

Looking forward to seeing some energy to wrap things up :)

Shida as co-chair

On Oct 9, 2016, at 4:57 AM, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com<mailto:shida@ntt-at.com>> wrote:


Hmmm…

It has been over 2 weeks and there were no feedbacks.

I will extend the WGLC for another 2 weeks (until 10/22).

If you have read the document and you see no issue in progressing the doc to IESG, please express that on the list.

Thanks
Shida

On Sep 22, 2016, at 8:53 AM, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com<mailto:shida@ntt-at.com>> wrote:


All;

cc’ing Harald as most of the changes were based on his comment.

With the new draft submitted reflecting the consensus of the WG at the March IETF, I am commencing a 2 week working group last call (WGLC).

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics/

The WGLC will last two weeks ending on 10/6.

When commenting, please be constructive when addressing an issue and don’t forget to show +1/support if you have no issue but you have read the draft and you agree with the contents of the draft.

Shida
as co-chair
_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org<mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email