Re: [xrblock] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics

"Zhenghui (Marvin)" <> Tue, 22 November 2016 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172CF129C50 for <>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 01:29:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.717
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVRmeQE56z0R for <>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 01:29:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D2D129C1E for <>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 01:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DBD08114; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:36 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:29:34 +0800
From: "Zhenghui (Marvin)" <>
To: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics
Thread-Index: AQHSPxFJ20M4gJZwC0uSZgoGZ/DqdKDbMrMAgAmSzBA=
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:34 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F8F4995E43962F4996B280E9678CED00B93EC7szxeml512mbschina_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.58341002.0075, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: e26c0c57a7806664e1971eca86dbc880
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:43 -0000


Just reviewed this document, looks good as far as I’m concerned, except for some trivial problems:

1)       Found a typo “mechianism” as in section 3 paragraph 3, “Without the support of RTCP XRs or some other signaling  mechianism,”

2)       Better to give full name when first time “MoS” is used.

Best Regards,
Zhenghui (Marvin)

发件人: xrblock [] 代表 Shida Schubert
发送时间: 2016年11月15日 15:24
收件人: Shida Schubert
抄送: xrblock
主题: [xrblock] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics


I am going to attempt to recruit some reviewers at the IETF this week for our last draft in the milestone.

With the hope that I am going to get some reviewers :), I am extending the last call for another 2 weeks ending on Nov 29th.

Looking forward to seeing some energy to wrap things up :)

Shida as co-chair

On Oct 9, 2016, at 4:57 AM, Shida Schubert <<>> wrote:


It has been over 2 weeks and there were no feedbacks.

I will extend the WGLC for another 2 weeks (until 10/22).

If you have read the document and you see no issue in progressing the doc to IESG, please express that on the list.


On Sep 22, 2016, at 8:53 AM, Shida Schubert <<>> wrote:


cc’ing Harald as most of the changes were based on his comment.

With the new draft submitted reflecting the consensus of the WG at the March IETF, I am commencing a 2 week working group last call (WGLC).

The WGLC will last two weeks ending on 10/6.

When commenting, please be constructive when addressing an issue and don’t forget to show +1/support if you have no issue but you have read the draft and you agree with the contents of the draft.

as co-chair
xrblock mailing list<>