Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 13:28 UTC
Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54F91270FC for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 05:28:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mdd-sk1C7dc4 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 05:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB226126D05 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 05:28:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 85E45B89E3AF1 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:27:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.40) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:28:00 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.214]) by dggemm423-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:27:56 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
Thread-Index: AQHTkq63T6oPpOt1LU2pmBlw4wytEKN/44ew
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:27:57 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD85FBC3@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAFgnS4WpSVb8TybG+5ttowsxYc7zo2aqGVbg4TfXPJkNcfJ5PQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4WpSVb8TybG+5ttowsxYc7zo2aqGVbg4TfXPJkNcfJ5PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.126.202.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD85FBC3DGGEMM506MBXchina_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/0jEuO9yg1qI_S8Ue_ej69FJVpqY>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:28:06 -0000
Hi Dan, We would like to discuss the effective loss index draft , we would like to have it adopted as a WG item. It is also tied to the IPPN metric registry which is also a topic to be discussed in XRblocks Roni From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dan Romascanu Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 1:55 PM To: xrblock Subject: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Hi, There has been little activity lately on the mail list, and I am not aware about any new proposals. It does not seem that there is any need for xrblock to meet at IETF 101. Please let know the WG mail list of any other opinions before Monday 1/29. If there are no requests or comments I will push the 'no meeting' button. Thanks and Regards, Dan
- [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Roni Even (A)