Re: [xrblock] WGLC on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-02.txt

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F8111E80E4 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KeAVg0n3S3bE for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A24311E80D3 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQFAFupNVHGmAcF/2dsb2JhbABEgmaDarwEDXcWc4IfAQEBAQMSIlEEAgEGAg0BAwQBAQUGHQUCAjAUCQgCBAESCBqHcQGQfZBYiiUIgj6QNYEfjTwmEgaCIzZhA5xkilSDCIIn
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,786,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="1003806"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2013 12:36:57 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2013 12:35:47 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:36:55 -0400
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] WGLC on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHODvKrcs1kQkn3Bk21hCsSdPdRs5iZtP4AgAiLqLCAACDPQA==
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:36:54 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0A9514@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <00B2102B-B085-40EB-BA98-ACFDC4F2E82C@ntt-at.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0A25C9@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43A2F504@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43A2F504@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-02.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:37:00 -0000

Hi Qin,

Please provide text that indicates the references for the two metrics. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qin Wu [mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:32 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Shida Schubert; xrblock
> Subject: 答复: [xrblock] WGLC on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-
> synchronization-02.txt
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] 代表
> Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> 发送时间: 2013年3月7日 7:09
> 收件人: Shida Schubert; xrblock
> 主题: Re: [xrblock] WGLC on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-
> 02.txt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Please find below my comments:
> 
> 1. Are the Initial Synchronization Delay and the Synchronization Offset
> new metrics introduced by this draft? So it seems, as in section 2.1 the
> mention to the Initial Synchronization Delay has a reference to RFC
> 6051, but there is no metric definition there, while the explanation
> about the Synchronization Offset seems to include a self-contained
> definition. In this case I believe that the guidelines of using the
> template in RFC 6390 applies, and section 2.1 must be re-written on
> these lines.
> 
> [Qin]: Not sure we are dedicated to define new metrics in this draft,
> clarification is section 2.1 of RFC6051 gives a clear definition of
> initial synchronization delay and indicate how to calculate it. Table 7
> of BBF TR-126 gives a good example of synchronization offset, but TR126
> uses a different term.