Re: [xrblock] [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07

"Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com> Fri, 01 March 2013 09:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20D021F8717; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 01:24:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4pn-Ws4mMnx3; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 01:24:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8705421F8698; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 01:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AOY17428; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:24:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:24:33 +0000
Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:24:45 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.101]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 17:24:40 +0800
From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07
Thread-Index: AQHOEtmU4++bSb9NUky+3cwP5OU1O5iKPXwQgACdmICABTS6AIAAhzOQ
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:24:39 +0000
Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB4571D058@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CF2A53F@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com> <51307284.7090603@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <51307284.7090603@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.104]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability@tools.ietf.org>, "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:24:52 -0000

Hi Gonzalo,

Already fixed. The 09 version has addressed this issue.
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-09

Best Regards!
Rachel

-----Original Message-----
From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 5:19 PM
To: Ali C. Begen (abegen)
Cc: Huangyihong (Rachel); draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability@tools.ietf.org; mmusic@ietf.org; xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07

Authors,

could you please fix the title of the draft per Ali's suggestion below?
You can submit a new revision of the draft addressing this issue once
the IETF LC on it is over.

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 25/02/2013 11:48 AM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Huangyihong   (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
> Date: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:28 AM
> To: "Ali C. Begen" <abegen@cisco.com>om>,
> "draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability@tools.ietf.org"
> <draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability@tools.ietf.org>
> Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>rg>, "gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com"
> <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
> Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07
> 
>> Technical Issues:
>> -----------------
>> 1) I am puzzled why you named the new block as "non-psi-ts-decodability".
>> It does not follow what you have in the title. I also did not get the
>> "non" part.
>>
>> [Rachel]: To get consistent with the title we used, how about we propose
>> to change the block name in SDP as "ts-psi-indep-decodability"?
> 
> I see that you already submitted a revision. Your current title says:
> 
> RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for MPEG2 Program
>       Specific Information (PSI) Independent Transport Stream (TS)
>                 Decodability Statistics Metric reporting
> 
> 
> This still does not make sense to me. "Transport Stream" should be before
> "Program Specific Information". My other comment on the title was it
> should be "Š Metrics Reporting" not "Metric reporting".
> 
> -acbegen
> 
>