Re: [xrblock] (2nd) WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb

"Claire Bi(jiayu)" <> Mon, 22 April 2013 02:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B6321F8617 for <>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.482
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SARE_RECV_IP_218078=1.666]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EGfkkr41Swh6 for <>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6F321F85D6 for <>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bijiayu-nb ( []) by (HERMES) with ESMTP id D03ECAC04C; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:56:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from bijiayu-nb ([]) by 21CN-entas5(MEDUSA with ESMTP id 1366599384.7698 for ; Mon Apr 22 10:56:29 2013
0/X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
1/X-Total-Score: 0:
3/X-Total-Score: 0:
X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<8593908e82948482618297829a824f84908e9993838d90848c618a8695874f909388>, score=<1366599389IJJxJJvJIxvM54o0SJJJJJ77577j7a5jmM9KOI77777a>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:56:48 +0800
From: "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <>, "xrblock" <>
Message-ID: <>
X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 23 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon448080237078_====="
Subject: Re: [xrblock] (2nd) WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 02:56:36 -0000

Hi Dan,

Sorry for the late reply. I've reviewed this draft and think it is ready for submission to the IESG.

Just one small question.

Section 4.2 Interval Metric flag
It has defined the meaning of I=01,10 and 11. What would the receiver do if I=00?
I suggest to add following text:

The value I=00 is reserved, and MUST NOT be used.  If the
value I=00 is received, the XR block MUST be ignored by the

Thanks and Regards,

> -----Original Message-----
> From:  Romascanu, Dan (Dan) 
> Date:  2013-04-08  22:06:27 
> To:  xrblock 
> Cc:  
> Subject:  [xrblock] (2nd) WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb 
This is the second WGLC for the Internet-Draft 'RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Jitter Buffer Metric Reporting'. Please send your comments, questions, and concerns to the WG list before Monday 4/22 COB. If you have no comments or questions and you believe that this document is ready for submission to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard, please send a message stating this. 
The latest version of the document can be retrieved from
Thanks and Regards,
xrblock mailing list
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 8207 (20130408) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.