IETF Logo Mail Archive

[xrblock] 答复: Changes to the name of a metric block FOR perf-metric-registry

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD33821F8F32 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.216, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Km8xoMD1VSEu for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E4411E819C for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVP54421; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:08:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:08:25 +0100
Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:08:35 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.43]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:08:31 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] Changes to the name of a metric block FOR perf-metric-registry
Thread-Index: AQHOjgtL+U0CrCbWlkiv0+X4A/+N45l+/cwg
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:08:28 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43B70D36@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <B236ED6A-4E09-44E5-A700-44528006B7B9@ntt-at.com>
In-Reply-To: <B236ED6A-4E09-44E5-A700-44528006B7B9@ntt-at.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.149.241]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [xrblock] 答复: Changes to the name of a metric block FOR perf-metric-registry
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:08:57 -0000

Hi, Shida:
Yes, I was reminded by Varun as well.
My proposed change for threshold defined in the burst gap discard draft is
Using "Burst gap discard threshold in RTP" to replace "threshold in RTP".

In addition, I am aware that another pitfall, " Total Packets Expected in Bursts " in burst gap discard draft conflict with one used in RFC6958 as well.
My proposed change is using " Total Packets Expected in Discard Bursts " to replace "Total Packets Expected in Burst"

Let me know if these changes make sense. If yes, I will send a message to RFC Editor and ask her to take proposed change.

Regards!
-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Shida Schubert
发送时间: 2013年8月1日 0:30
收件人: xrblock
主题: [xrblock] Changes to the name of a metric block FOR perf-metric-registry


All;

 Varun has pointed out that registry in Performance Metric Registry defined in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-claise-ippm-perf-metric-registry-00#section-4
has duplicate names for report blocks that are semantically/syntactically different. 
It's the "Threshold in RTP" and are currently defined both in RFC6958 and in draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard although they  should have a unique names. 

 The draft is in RFC Ed-Queue and the name will be swapped with whatever we agree on. 

 If you have a suggestion for a new name, please let me know. 

 Also if you object to changing the name for any reason, please voice it and present a constructive way to resolve the name conflict issues in "perf-metric-registry". 

 Many Thanks
  Shida as co-chair
_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email