Re: [xrblock] consensus call: merger of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-02.txt and draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec-00.txt

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 21 November 2012 12:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D93921F850E for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:14:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HQzfCXu-Geib for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:14:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1286721F850A for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:14:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b47so4492054eek.31 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:14:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=Dh/zfgjE1zpWFGWzhVyQWZLvpeyUxOE8CebMItv3rEI=; b=GHQore/fi+y27ybSBohciz7s6GBfrnVxqqj8D55MjTdJzxKBZ4FGoVbvq3JL2MOHbk 0DuKldiRK2fm5LmDfJm2KkD7z0yQRyBKrJXQ1zh3CX2Aovtr7A17okTVL6cwWx1zOBBl 71miqqOPsQwg2C7Mtrs/A6D/v2DeOeD3OZW4HG/W7ky4J2VGeg+U4inpYOq2lgxX/XAl 3hdjUM8E5WQPRxyoPKVMz4aN2UGvYmDB8pp5vel/kTsuIGP7CpySRcpJhPTxKti6Dpjc k5Wlt7x5heMzi1LfHpFpTVaZRxgtzYOjlzYLkJ38lCRTO+Gny/NYQ0CynSDIeCHfJS2Q 9Ehw==
Received: by 10.14.176.68 with SMTP id a44mr45135744eem.1.1353500060308; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:14:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from RoniE ([109.64.71.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o47sm36828418eem.11.2012.11.21.04.14.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:14:19 -0800 (PST)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: "'Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)'" <dromasca@avaya.com>, <xrblock@ietf.org>
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0408469A6E@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0408469A6E@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:11:44 +0200
Message-ID: <025a01cdc7e1$61b47d80$251d7880$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGiUl7ZUUUVlJRxgmcpYqxmq1L5Z5hLHWHA
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [xrblock] consensus call: merger of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-02.txt and draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec-00.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:14:22 -0000

Hi,
I noticed that the two previous AVT documents have an IPR statement  so I
see no problem with the merge currently.
At the meeting some people thought that only one of the avt document had an
IPR statement.

Roni

-----Original Message-----
From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: 15 November, 2012 2:35 PM
To: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: [xrblock] consensus call: merger of
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-02.txt and
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec-00.txt

During the WG meeting at IETF-85 the consensus of the participants was that
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-02.txt and
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec-00.txt should be merged, pending the
verification of the IPR disclosure issues by the chairs. After the
verification the ADs advised that the merger is possible while suggesting
that the discloser consider making a statement pointing to the new document.
We would like to confirm this decision on the WG mail list. If anybody has a
concern about the decision please express it on the WG list before Sunday
11/25.

Thanks and Regards,

Shida and Dan
_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock