[xrblock] no meeting at IETF-102
Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Fri, 01 June 2018 15:45 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D260412D95D for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UWmpbMWgNBDX for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x233.google.com (mail-ot0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C1C212D948 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l12-v6so29795968oth.6 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s0jIrnCEsP8f09dpbQMxefzC6EAdxUrKpTGLNK6NKE8=; b=sdHUj9WIt6xaCFP/H1saP0yesu/tq6bgcEhNEIO+xO55qpCb9oPPpvfdQSOxws9y+2 B/U53tERorCT2iVv3Jwp/BMziAx0BuNGI/ejUm93TZGNAGL60NCMuI6gQx97qZ5paMhu PQN1A6V55OzideJRxWAH7RiXeSJ/OGYGOCxXBejyi025kvFVnUVNjslFJ1jxtT+3JXt8 FjD4UcAnKTee6VTTbZmMTzjzGgncX1Uwo/x1MARqYupzpeXTevStcZowWeqr6y6BhanU OfB/mT8qG7EyvEVzOWh+w5ztZ7A6b2BisDxi1HS4uSVBNuBb2HydbNYwimIfFqzXPY7+ 64IA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s0jIrnCEsP8f09dpbQMxefzC6EAdxUrKpTGLNK6NKE8=; b=NgM0I36eZEVQEKY5abOVmDHyLI0tRxxnXrDqc9JGeNmXmZOSCWndux0zGYwKttpwU5 zF2u7euxN30UYeQUPlZE66a5q4gykE5OHAX4cfGteLJbKu96qE45h0g/8dM2cyaUMJUM RvjdLF8C7Hntw10QWXNJh5CzIRCg0vm6YKP3p8LSM+8/U8b6EYVXM/RFSg6YWW0wM4hp e2vTDe/UzD7CvgOEoDEJd2Au8taJSEmfD1PpbY7gQlmtcUN8E3+K4cvPmsjMqwGjIdRC 2wuJ+BfB85IrFJOmw76dRIWFtXtAlApJ9iyxKLw7dEtoyYNo9Mxvehi9S/UdFXv2rBfy VpIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcLxGkUwtncwq7BLty8GfVFefnyQtOLLFaOkFhhDXiLWC5x7BDR rE0AU6nZnbsYhZXtDVMEbMiRqAPhAyTtANkOcME=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLRAouDK6ybPLRShcahAveDDPfl+F+h9PFQYbYgV80me/wwxlUIFzBFs/OWKHwdt3A31mVSGTvs16Kw3ssfjs8=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:50ad:: with SMTP id b45-v6mr7311298oth.102.1527867950186; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:aca:d19:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 17:45:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4Wiv7CUSNBEb1WO6qZN+eKb_Rw5R7xdw2C=jRTDxywuFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006f44ae056d967a22"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/55XzLYoOQ-HfvFUh_7PkmEge08M>
Subject: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF-102
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 15:45:53 -0000
Hi, I have received no request or seen any traffic about the need or desire for xrblock to meet at IETF 102. I have noticed our AD and the secretariat that the WG will not meet. Regards, Dan
- [xrblock] no meeting at IETF-102 Dan Romascanu