Re: [xrblock] Review of draft-huang-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-03

[Glen Zorn <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 09:34 +0000, Brandenburg, R. (Ray) van wrote:


>         
>       * 
>       * I noticed the abstract of the draft references  ‘priorities’
>         without explaining what those priorities are and where they
>         come from (do they come from ETSI TR 101290?). 


See below.


>       * ETSI TR 101290 is referenced as a normative reference,
>         although that document is a Technical Report (instead of a TS)
>         and is thus by definition informational. A informative
>         reference might be more suitable.


The ETSI classification of a document is largely irrelevant IMHO: I
believe that, in the IETF, a normative reference is one which must be
read and understood in order to read and understand the document citing
it.  ETSI TR 101290 seems to me to fit those criteria in this case.

...