Re: [xrblock] (2nd) WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb

"Roni Even" <> Wed, 10 April 2013 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A799421F8F17 for <>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.171
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=1, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NtYhSX4qmc5Z for <>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22f]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A94821F8E59 for <>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id r16so85508ead.34 for <>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; bh=gnERiFfQ0hQt+WnUXnW38uFTsgubGWnHRg2WYHizuzA=; b=hi9BOcO+8oRCK7fDT+SSIdP2q9MZQ2ibLOJjmioFsWxFtk0Vw5Uy14o3uRBaoW4vg1 L4+Jz8qtjGBtmniqBSeZGV4H7QBqeV4t1AF5R2TJSwmQaH9jRwyxx6Xx7FFuHPUiOR3H 8YtCq74zaToXcwHnOdykIk/8UQB++bpDfaRetlB87BADvOhmgQ40uAA4cQf5zqJMhUmL HfdZ/OdzKENndi6dJ3a3IkIPGfRNTsMCAIG2GHf4ydN93wbNejD0RGjQdILYepeLIhfI ZgF4bXNnXs4dTtGy9LrLyVJ03Kl1VkoNdiPDDvcCJfbSRnwJQakMb1OJxQ+sXNWFNT2d Es0w==
X-Received: by with SMTP id n48mr3213022eem.3.1365581377668; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE ( []) by with ESMTPS id t4sm42249228eel.0.2013. (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Roni Even" <>
To: "'Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)'" <>, "'xrblock'" <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:09:10 +0300
Message-ID: <038d01ce35c2$b05ac7b0$11105710$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQF0pUs7X2uw/tfQOA/ysWrcexC/AJmCONAQ
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [xrblock] (2nd) WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:09:43 -0000

I reviewed the document and it is ready for publication.

Just some nits

1. Section 3 5th paragraph "then then"

2. In section 3.1 "In practice jitter buffer implementations vary
considerably however should behave" suggest " In practice jitter buffer
implementations vary considerably however they should behave".

3. in section 4 change the two "should" to "SHOULD"

4. in section 4.2  in the " jitter buffer maximum delay" description "
earliest arriving packet In simple queue" to "earliest arriving packet. In
simple queue"

5. in section 5.2 " When SDP is used in offer-answer" suggest adding a
reference to RFC3264.

Roni Even

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf
Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: 08 April, 2013 5:06 PM
To: xrblock
Subject: [xrblock] (2nd) WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb

This is the second WGLC for the Internet-Draft 'RTP Control Protocol (RTCP)
Extended Report (XR) Block for Jitter Buffer Metric Reporting'. Please send
your comments, questions, and concerns to the WG list before Monday 4/22
COB. If you have no comments or questions and you believe that this document
is ready for submission to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed
Standard, please send a message stating this. 

The latest version of the document can be retrieved from

Thanks and Regards,


xrblock mailing list