Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Wed, 12 December 2012 07:13 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1621821F885B for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:13:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0bQgNHPIF5tf for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [93.93.131.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3055B21F882A for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.209.254.18] (helo=vpn18.dcs.gla.ac.uk) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1TigVG-0001TQ-QW; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:16 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <B2EA72D743904C77BDC42AD1B9E9C61B@china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:13:01 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <14AD24AB-6B86-4E5C-80C8-C778561CCE7B@csperkins.org>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA024828@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com><A9B61A34-690A-4F19-930E-CCBE3FC508CB@csperkins.org> <50C806FB.8050603@gmail.com> <B2EA72D743904C77BDC42AD1B9E9C61B@china.huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -13
X-Mythic-Debug: Threshold = On =
Cc: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:31 -0000

On 12 Dec 2012, at 08:06, Qin Wu wrote:
>> - The description of SDP offer/answer usage in Section 4.2 is
>> insufficient, and needs to be updated in a manner analogous to the
>> other recent RTCP XR blocks.
> 
> Can you be more specific, please?
> 
> [Qin]: In my interpretation, the other recent RTCP XR blocks are referred to Burst gap loss draft and Burst gap discard draft which get SDP Directorate review recently.

Correct, sorry if I wasn't clear.


-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/