Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-04.txt

"Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn> Fri, 06 July 2012 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bijy@sttri.com.cn>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF3A11E8083 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.459
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jo3tvxRwlwtp for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from corp.21cn.com (corp.forptr.21cn.com [121.14.129.38]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0338B11E8073 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip?10.27.10.86? (entas7.inner-hermes.com [10.27.101.7]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 214A9484008; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 11:19:18 +0800 (CST)
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_IP: wmail.10.27.101.7.33606369
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: WEBMAIL
Received: from ip<10.27.10.86> ([10.27.10.86]) by 21CN-ent7(MEDUSA 10.27.101.7) with ESMTP id 1341544758.17966 for bill.wu@huawei.com ; Fri Jul 6 11:19:21 2012
0/X-Total-Score: 3:
X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<838a8d8d4f98966189968298868a4f84908e9993838d90848c618a8695874f909388>, score=<1341544761DELNllMll1ll9llDlqUM197NErppipp3ppHpp7pTdi3H>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:19:18 +0800
From: "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <2093114163.291341544758452.JavaMail.hermes@ent-web6>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_34_2008763897.1341544758129"
HMM_WEBCLN_IP: 10.27.10.86
X-HERMES-SENDMODE: normal
X-HERMES-SET: KoH0oguRsun5ALVzckz3EqaqqOumqw==
Cc: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-04.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:19:09 -0000

Hi Qin,
 
In the description of block length, it is said, "For the Delay block, the block length is equal to 2."
 
"Delay block" should be "Discard Count block".
 
 
Claire Bi