IETF Logo Mail Archive

[xrblock] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6958 (4424)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 21 July 2015 11:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5987A1A0419 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kAjVj7ifIgnn for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F371A039C for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E36FA180204; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: alan.d.clark@telchemy.com, zhangyx@sttri.com.cn, zhaojing@sttri.com.cn, sunseawq@huawei.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, dromasca@avaya.com, shida@ntt-at.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150721114549.E36FA180204@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:45:49 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/8sQ0O57XZfh9t9hcyITr7ZnGT_g>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:06:51 -0700
Cc: varun.singh@iki.fi, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: [xrblock] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6958 (4424)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:49:45 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6958,
"RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric Reporting".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6958&eid=4424

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Varun Singh <varun.singh@iki.fi>

Section: 3.1

Original Text
-------------
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |            Packets Lost in Bursts             |    Total...   |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | ...Packets Expected in Bursts |    Number of Bursts   | Sum of|
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                ...Squares of Burst Durations (ms-squared)     |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Corrected Text
--------------
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |            Packets Lost in Bursts             |    Total...   
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
           Packets Expected in Bursts |        Number of Bursts       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                Sum of Squares of Burst Durations (ms-squared)  
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       ...    |                    reserved                           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Notes
-----
The packet format on Section 3.1 shows 12 bits,  however 
section 3.2 defines the "Number of bursts" as a 16 bits 
length field.

Relevant text from Section 3.2 pasted below:

  Number of Bursts: 16 bits

    The number of bursts in the period of the report (Interval or
    Cumulative).

    The measured value is an unsigned value.  If the measured value
    exceeds 0xFFFD, the value 0xFFFE MUST be reported to indicate 
    an over-range measurement.  If the measurement is unavailable, 
    the value 0xFFFF MUST be reported.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6958 (draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric Reporting
Publication Date    : May 2013
Author(s)           : A. Clark, S. Zhang, J. Zhao, Q. Wu, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Metric Blocks for use with RTCPs Extended Report Framework RAI
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email