IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 10 July 2012 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A6D21F86C2 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QvcJXKqwPMRj for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0187D21F86BD for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFACcv/E+HCzI1/2dsb2JhbABFgkqDHLB+gRyBB4IgAQEBAQMBAQEPCgcKAz4XBAIBCA0BAwQBAQsGDAsBAgICAQElHwkIAQEEARIIGodrC59Eih6THQSLQIUQMmADmy6KDYJh
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,559,1336363200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="356722643"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2012 09:32:04 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.13]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2012 09:16:23 -0400
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD5EA0.DAC5F82D"
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:35:21 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407CC38AE@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <DCA5E33723DD4E46BD2B76B9C1BB5D6F@china.huawei.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status
Thread-Index: Ac1eXx/lD1Ayw9QtRbOm0FhNM0/dUwAP49zQ
References: <136707783.24291341896234959.JavaMail.hermes@ent-web2> <DCA5E33723DD4E46BD2B76B9C1BB5D6F@china.huawei.com>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:34:58 -0000

Hi,

 

I plan to start the WGLC soon in order to gather feedback before the IETF meeting. Any pending comments can be queued and will be considered together with the other WGLC comments. 

 

Regards,

 

Dan

 

 

 

From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:41 AM
To: Claire Bi(jiayu); xrblock
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status

 

Hi,Claire:

If my memory is correct, these two drafts are now in the Queue of drafts for WGLC.

Regarding your quick comment, yes, these two drafts should be updated to make

consistent with other XR drafts. 

Thanks!

 

Regards!

-Qin

	----- Original Message ----- 

	From: Claire Bi(jiayu) <mailto:bijy@sttri.com.cn>  

	To: xrblock <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>  

	Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:57 PM

	Subject: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status

	 

	Hi,all: 

	
	I'm wondering what's the status of Burst Gap drafts? 
	I have reviewed draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard 
	and draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss and have one comment that is applied to both document. 

	
	1 bit Interval metric flag in the metric block is not consistent with other XR drafts that complete WGLC. 
	I think this issue should be fixed before going for WGLC. 

	Regards! 

	
	Claire Bi 

________________________________

	_______________________________________________
	xrblock mailing list
	xrblock@ietf.org
	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status