Re: [xrblock] WGLC for aft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-02.txt

Qin Wu <> Tue, 24 July 2012 02:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13ADC11E80F6 for <>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.578
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.268, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8xceZfHs7Jz7 for <>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D049D11E8085 for <>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AIH02776; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:34:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:32:24 -0700
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:32:26 -0700
Received: from w53375 ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:32:22 +0800
Message-ID: <>
From: Qin Wu <>
References: <>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:32:22 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: []
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC for aft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-02.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 02:35:08 -0000

Thank for your comments, please see replies inline.
-----Original Message-----
From: Huangyihong (Rachel) 
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 5:33 PM
To: 'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'; xrblock
Subject: RE: [xrblock] WGLC for aft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-02.txt


I have read this document and believe it's in good shape. I have 3 minor comments:

1.  Section 3.2, the definition of " Loss and Discard Combination flag ": in some sentences, the key words "should" and "should not" are supposed to be capitalized.

[Qin]: Good suggestion. Also I think uppercase "MUST" may be more appropriate since we don't have exceptional case for not discarding or discarding.

2. Section 3.2, block length: 16 bits, "For the Delay block, the block length is equal to 5." should be corrected to "For the Burst/Gap Loss block, the block length is equal to 5."

[Qin]: Good catch and will fix this.

3. Some editorial errors, for example, in the fourth paragraph of section 1.1, the space before the dot should be deleted.

[Qin]: Confirmed and thanks.

Best regards,

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:56 PM
To: xrblock
Subject: [xrblock] WGLC for aft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-02.txt

This message initiates a Working Group Last Call for the Internet-Draft
' RTCP XR Report Block for Burst/Gap Loss metric Reporting '. Please
read and send your comments, questions and concerns to the WG mail list
before 7/25 COB. 

If you read the document and you believe it's just fine and ready for
submission to the IESG please send a message stating this. 

The document is available at

Thanks and Regards,


xrblock mailing list