Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 24 May 2013 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C81721F9412 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HQH1w18db43N for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F3A21F9401 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ARR30708; Fri, 24 May 2013 00:41:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 24 May 2013 01:41:26 +0100
Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 24 May 2013 01:41:39 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.43]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Fri, 24 May 2013 08:41:37 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization
Thread-Index: AQHOV6EjEHA+cYzMVE+TI7Ux/+aq4ZkTf5Rg
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 00:41:36 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43B3A447@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <BA5D79A3-15E9-4038-851F-C4A37A638D25@ntt-at.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA17577A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA17579E@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA17579E@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43B3A447nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: xrblock-chairs <xrblock-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 00:41:56 -0000

Fixed, thanks Dan.

Regards!
-Qin

From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:34 PM
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Shida Schubert; xrblock
Cc: xrblock-chairs
Subject: Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization

I should have read the comments already made first. I see Roni caught this already, and the resolution proposed by Qin is OK with me.

Regards,

Dan



From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:32 PM
To: Shida Schubert; xrblock
Cc: xrblock-chairs
Subject: Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization

Hi,

Sorry for the delay, but I got only now to reading again the I-D and I noticed the following:


In the Metric Block Structure diagram in section 3.1 the Reserved block occupies 8 bits (from bit 8 to bit 15). However the description in 3.2 says 'Reserved: 6 bits' which seems to be wrong.



Regards,



Dan





From: Shida Schubert [mailto:shida@ntt-at.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 4:56 AM
To: xrblock
Cc: xrblock-chairs
Subject: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization

 This is an announcement of a 2 weeks XRBLOCK WG last call on
"Report Block for Synchronization Delay and Offset Metrics Reporting"
priort o requesting publication of the document as a proposed standard.

 As per discussion at the last meeting, we are running a second
WGLC on this draft.

Please send your comments, including nits, to the list by the

22nd of May

If you read the draft and you see no issues, concerns, or nits, please
express the fact that you have no issue progressing the draft on the
list as well.

The latest version can be found here:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-04.txt

Regards

Shida as co-chair