[xrblock] Pointer to Active Registry Draft and RTCP-XR example metric

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Tue, 22 July 2014 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14251B2B0F for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q1S0fHjRBh3u for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07691A0162 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDFC121114 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:51:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.243]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D038F03C1 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:46:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:46:34 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:46:33 -0400
Thread-Topic: Pointer to Active Registry Draft and RTCP-XR example metric
Thread-Index: AQHPpdTgqnKKnlvG7UinECjoroU1ZQ==
Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C803E616A0DE@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/BWWoTlo8vy76uqVmFEoc3-zh9QM
Subject: [xrblock] Pointer to Active Registry Draft and RTCP-XR example metric
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:46:46 -0000

I'd like your feedback on this draft/example, as a co-author.
It would be fine to post it to the ippm-list, too.

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active/

note that the eventual plan is to combine passive and active registries.
there are references in the draft above to the common draft, which
will inherit all the active columns, etc. soon.

Al