Re: [xrblock] E-flag in xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics
Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 31 May 2012 13:11 UTC
Return-Path: <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F8321F86AA for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pIzU+VijfkZM for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D3D21F86A6 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so606292wgb.13 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cpBdcWc0VFNqFksf+TDguNGKUI3S94pybo+hSZ8uT6o=; b=jxWev2iMBG0idGCYD/7qLDkmFWiaRcIwIHxDvy02HjHxxgQCQCOq2Ta1curiInwIs3 GL8WfIdlYtscHTI59gGsZroSZLb2CSjR287wZdTrHAa0ImdTasqtqeQaIJW+cap+nPdd R3m6emGq8atfgkYY9H22q9jg7sVZhtUNwwZ3W1dl13i+orSIc/U+1191ZTh3ahoAeGH9 j4hak2+6U7ntzKMWQdxM7cEYxlgePeKiLSEd6kpu41m2NR+ojAkK7MEx//1gxOH/d5ot WARML4F8IOeisk1AjuOC6FX5wBTVzraHYb4j2Qe37xbqCNHWvB4Wvw41T0ceuooryPlf rBVQ==
Received: by 10.216.143.195 with SMTP id l45mr13968758wej.49.1338469903822; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.88.78 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 16:11:23 +0300
Message-ID: <CAEbPqrw_Q0rbFK-pcSuPRsYR8B4i7QJEjgazW9+o__nLaMruPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: xrblock-chairs@tools.ietf.org, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] E-flag in xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:11:46 -0000
Hi all, There were a few emails exchanged on the mailing list with regards to the E-flag (for early and late discards). The discard-03 draft expands the E-bit from 1-bit to 2-bits, which now expresses different reasons for discards (misc, early, late, cumulative). Discarded bytes can be used by the RTP sender to observe overuse or underuse and react accordingly. Similarly the discarded RLE shows which packets were discarded and more importantly the pattern of discards (towards the beginning or later in the reported interval). For example: the RTP sender can overlay the discard RLE and loss RLE and observe if the losses occurred after discards. The discard-RLE draft already provides a brief guideline on when to use the different discard reports. We can clarify there that the discard RLE and bytes should be used where precision is required else use the discarded packets report (which gives more range of discard types). Therefore, I do not think this expansion is required for the discarded bytes or Discard RLE and a single bit identifying discard due to late and early should be sufficient. Comments? Cheers, Varun On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> wrote: > > This is an announcement of a 2 weeks XRBLOCK WG last call on > "Report Block for Run Length Encodings of Discarded Packets" prior > to requesting publication of the document as a proposed standard. > > Please send your comments, including nits, to the list by the > > 14th of June > > If you read the draft and you see no issues, concerns, or nits, please > express the fact that you have no issue progressing the draft on the > list as well. > > The latest version can be found here: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-03 > > Regards > > Shida as co-chair > _______________________________________________ > xrblock mailing list > xrblock@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock -- http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/
- Re: [xrblock] E-flag in xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-r… Varun Singh
- Re: [xrblock] E-flag in xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-r… Colin Perkins