Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg

Dan

As a WG participant I would support the document proceeding after the 
IPR disclosure has been withdrawn.

Regards

Alan Clark

On 4/7/16 4:19 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>
> Speaking as a contributor, I agree with your point.
>
> As a WG chair and document shepherd – I will raise this issue with the 
> AD. The control belongs to the IESG at this point – this is the way I 
> understand the process (and I may be wrong on this).
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
> *From:*Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB) [mailto:keith.drage@nokia.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:15 PM
> *To:* Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Shida Schubert
> *Cc:* xrblock
> *Subject:* RE: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>
> If I recall correctly, four people objected to the document proceeding.
>
> Some (including myself) indicated that they would review the position 
> if circumstances changed.
>
> Noone indicated an automatic change of their position on xxxx occurring.
>
> I don’t expect this to take long, but I still think this should be 
> asked, just to ensure there is nothing else lurking.
>
> Keith
>
> *From:*EXT Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> *Sent:* 07 April 2016 21:11
> *To:* Shida Schubert; Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)
> *Cc:* xrblock
> *Subject:* RE: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>
> Hi,
>
> As far as I understand the process, the document is now owned by the 
> Area Director. She may choose to consult the WG about the way forward, 
> but this is not a mandatory step in the process at this point.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
> *From:*xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Shida 
> Schubert
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:07 PM
> *To:* Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)
> *Cc:* xrblock
> *Subject:* Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>
> Keith;
>
> Good point, I will add that to the action item && change “Herald” > 
> “Harald” as noted.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Shida
>
>     On Apr 7, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)
>     <keith.drage@nokia.com <mailto:keith.drage@nokia.com>> wrote:
>
>     In regard to the unblocking of the video document, given that the
>     previous question went to the mailing list, formally I think you
>     should take the unblocking to the mailing list, i.e. ask “Can we
>     now proceed”. Obviously this can only happen when you can point to
>     the formal withdrawal.
>
>     Keith
>
>     *From:*xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org]*On Behalf Of*EXT
>     Shida Schubert
>     *Sent:*07 April 2016 20:34
>     *To:*xrblock
>     *Subject:*[xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>
>     All;
>
>     Minutes from the yesterday’s session is available below;
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-xrblock
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_proceedings_95_minutes_minutes-2D95-2Dxrblock&d=BQMFaQ&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=Buqlq696G77qgrig8ACRUKLkrM_0RjbUxX1yW0oOA3Y&s=XdEFhql_cVHAuZn1ETafcJ39HtJabyoO3QTyOzKEGRk&e=>
>
>     Please advice if anything should be corrected.
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     Shida
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock