[xrblock] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-06.txt
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Tue, 18 June 2013 03:31 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587B921F9A74 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.077
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.522, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PIihlber1F-3 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE42021F94DC for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ASN99239; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:30:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:30:35 +0100
Received: from NKGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.33) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:30:54 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.43]) by nkgeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.33]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:30:50 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOa9OHcNoEv0VcxkGCCZAdCJUkH5k6z4hg
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:30:49 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43B41FF0@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [xrblock] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-06.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:31:01 -0000
On 18 June , 2013 11:26 AM, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework Working Group of the IETF. Title : RTCP XR Report Block for Concealment metrics Reporting on Audio Applications Author(s) : Alan Clark Glen Zorn Claire Bi Qin Wu Filename : draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-06.txt Pages : 29 Date : 2013-06-17 Abstract: This document defines two RTCP XR Report Blocks that allows the reporting of concealment metrics for audio applications of RTP. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-06 [Qin]: Here is the update which is used to address comments we received during WGLC. The only comment we haven't addressed is one recently received from Colin, which suggests changing time unit from milliseconds to RTP timestamp unit. One more update may be needed based on Colin's feedback. _______________________________________________ xrblock mailing list xrblock@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock