Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <> Thu, 23 May 2013 10:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A4811E8132 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2013 03:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.411
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.411 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.187, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7Q+PrB2x6BL for <>; Thu, 23 May 2013 03:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10D911E8190 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2013 03:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,727,1363147200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="10373293"
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP; 23 May 2013 06:34:25 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP; 23 May 2013 06:29:10 -0400
Received: from ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:34:24 -0400
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <>, Shida Schubert <>, xrblock <>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization
Thread-Index: AQHOV6EWG3NZbVVCvEW56gxFjqK+bg==
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:34:22 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA17579EAZFFEXMB04globala_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: xrblock-chairs <>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:34:33 -0000

I should have read the comments already made first. I see Roni caught this already, and the resolution proposed by Qin is OK with me.



From: [] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:32 PM
To: Shida Schubert; xrblock
Cc: xrblock-chairs
Subject: Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization


Sorry for the delay, but I got only now to reading again the I-D and I noticed the following:

In the Metric Block Structure diagram in section 3.1 the Reserved block occupies 8 bits (from bit 8 to bit 15). However the description in 3.2 says 'Reserved: 6 bits' which seems to be wrong.



From: Shida Schubert []
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 4:56 AM
To: xrblock
Cc: xrblock-chairs
Subject: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization

 This is an announcement of a 2 weeks XRBLOCK WG last call on
"Report Block for Synchronization Delay and Offset Metrics Reporting"
priort o requesting publication of the document as a proposed standard.

 As per discussion at the last meeting, we are running a second
WGLC on this draft.

Please send your comments, including nits, to the list by the

22nd of May

If you read the draft and you see no issues, concerns, or nits, please
express the fact that you have no issue progressing the draft on the
list as well.

The latest version can be found here:


Shida as co-chair