IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] chair review of https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard-00.txt

Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2016 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4093812D931 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9m9cWVCEIIKM for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC6112D937 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e196so36557792lfg.1 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HigskO5Y3pQoOZvHMSGpFR02PsXVVo5Y6tjz/TcHFK8=; b=EB3Yt4hdlLXCFt86+2AxMeSuskuCfSgDoAVzyjLrEO9z8XqC74AP7QwsvN4nzermNa XVHkxahSHA4ZmL0SnpPuSMlZWpXaMmrecHrE1kamTlZiqBlrHKgrfmjkPcqw3lvFFDyB fjYvUkghJelOm/ZAm2zf4ObRJ/62xsFcSomyOkZZBqKsFEHgAbjnHuMGy3ig/3E/i4jJ fjcY0hA23duWjj3ByklT9N0Z++5IDaHFLdLLSicopPX8Zufr7f2ykOmBfxD/kpGfrxDP GgXO1EeGQD4MgnWE3n7oCRSnkAoRcT93HfVvlVCQF6usdbm9+HOKSzxcCENXnyxonZyI z5fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HigskO5Y3pQoOZvHMSGpFR02PsXVVo5Y6tjz/TcHFK8=; b=GlRrLW6+IuhsiHc1sC4krynNfeXtjXWDak3Ud7TQIagKUnSAUpBNhoTKciys1YohgV t529gICnFxtUrxyjURG7294gEPXuIB3nlFxfb9va4qiLXaXDE9BOM7FODNZhN6gzk5nQ uphhrVuAQPXHXbN6H2C1FHRpPuG5zr+HeIvfKL7ED3ZkWLR081ep//fs3gVVNDJ/a4P9 KsJAnptDIGhKTHeQR5dnivwPsvBXEnTzNECDRSAjD1FsIL84vwKsiHNDCPzU/qZbu+We jyEt+IBS4ICLEc9UDcu7mt4OiITnU6o4vf85JNj4jA0BLJFotlFJkHSUdcX+EgkgI5fc h78A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJxZyaIYgBDvzf1n7cPdIyMOzTWqyfbdyWSUAMACWDlD4uKhdnOnZAygY2lgxD0WrkbRfeKhGZkJAfzIQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.87.19 with SMTP id l19mr9201616lfb.27.1458579120087; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.157.134 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEDDA29@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEDDA29@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
From: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:51:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEbPqrzgtBf_2VnBK4FsrkG=6LuWJqahZpf_n6=s7Mf5HYdd-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/KuqpgXyc3ikoZF4RfpubAhrfi9k>
Cc: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] chair review of https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard-00.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:52:09 -0000

Hi Dan,


Thanks for the feedback, I incorporated all the changes.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Please find below my WG chair review of
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard-00.txt.
>
>
>
> I believe this document is in good shape, but a few more edits are needed:
>
>
>
> 1.       [RFC7003] should really be a Normative Reference. Tis future RFC
> will be used (also) in deployment, and it would be difficult for developers
> and operators to make sense what metrics need to be used in different cases
> from the two documents without reading them both. Also, in the Appendix,
> direct references are being made to [RFC7003].
>

Fixed.


> 2.       The first paragraph in section 1.1 needs some rewriting. The first
> sentence should be broken in two. In the second sentence s/and number of
> packets discarded/and the number of packets discarded/

Fixed.

>
> 3.       Also in section 1.1, paragraph 4: s/The variation in the number of
> packet discard in a burst/ The variation in the number of packet discards in
> a burst/
>

Fixed

> 4.       In section 3.3 in two instances: s/divide with/divide by/
>

Fixed.

> 5.       In Section 6.3 – the contact information should be ‘ART Area
> Directors <art-ads@tools.ietf.org
>

Done.

>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
>



-- 
http://www.callstats.io

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email