Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02

[Glen Zorn <[e-mail]>]

On 12/12/2012 04:16 AM, Colin Perkins wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2012, at 13:48,  Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
 >> This is a Working Group Last Call for
 >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02.txt.
 >>
 >>
 >> Please read and review this document, and send your comments,
 >> questions and concerns to the WG list before December 13, 2012. If
 >> you have no comments and you believe that the document is ready for
 >> submission to the IESG as a Standards Track document please send a
 >> short message as well to help us in determining the level of review
 >> and consensus.
 >
 >
 > I have some minor, primarily editorial, comments below, but in
 > general this looks okay.
 >
 > - should expand “TS” -> “MPEG Transport Stream” in the title

OK.

>
 >
 > - the first sentence of the Abstract could usefully be changed to “An
 > MPEG Transport Stream (TS) is a...”

I disagree: the sentence is not referring to a particular instance of 
TS, but to TS in general.  However, it might be useful to apply the same 
change here as you suggest for the title.

>
 >
 > - change “this draft” to “this memo” throughout

OK.

>
 >
 > - “occurances” -> “occurrences” in the Introduction

OK.

>
 >
 > - The packet diagram at the end of page 4 says “BT=TBD” but the text
 > at the top of page 5 says “...is identified by the constant <TDM>”.
 > These should be consistent, and should match the value in Section 5.

OK.

>
 >
 > - The description of SDP offer/answer usage in Section 4.2 is
 > insufficient, and needs to be updated in a manner analogous to the
 > other recent RTCP XR blocks.

Can you be more specific, please?

>
 >
 >