Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Wed, 12 December 2012 04:24 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045BC21F86C1 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:24:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9JzLDnov0+SB for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:24:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com (mail-da0-f46.google.com [209.85.210.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFC821F8675 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:24:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-da0-f46.google.com with SMTP id p5so89263dak.19 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:24:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aFaXseEKAd3EbG4bNapis7YIk/hKENMv1nLauqTE0pQ=; b=U7T4oHI0Qlt42g01GoOCADXqmaLWdWSVNqjGS/tVlFegr/cnKBH5Bry1HN49+ZXe1F sW8usVTSy7GGHEHohW4MQpLUgo7kwHORC83SVj62GwzQfxpl+rgCVf8aeXQULYt2ydfc 3vnEpTjeQS13MmyZ0IcnIhDyUUYlwRQ16bUU0WCC52wEjVzCx16YvLwyUmkIYkk6HGJo WuXq68/bHc0ZZkRAhpMzeJ9jg5EFsOtgLlFFk5+fqv+u67zo8lEkUdhkCkYkgm1HsHcM 8TABStK4Jjejnh7X2sNU2OHZwwokcSpn9xGNAhWUNcIdx99Z1c0cCDdj3TvgaTzOtwiv OaQw==
Received: by 10.68.209.230 with SMTP id mp6mr1750519pbc.8.1355286271974; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:24:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (ppp-115-87-71-254.revip4.asianet.co.th. [115.87.71.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nv2sm14908597pbc.44.2012.12.11.20.24.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:24:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50C806FB.8050603@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:24:27 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA024828@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <A9B61A34-690A-4F19-930E-CCBE3FC508CB@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <A9B61A34-690A-4F19-930E-CCBE3FC508CB@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:24:40 -0000

On 12/12/2012 04:16 AM, Colin Perkins wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2012, at 13:48,  Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
 >> This is a Working Group Last Call for
 >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02.txt.
 >>
 >>
 >> Please read and review this document, and send your comments,
 >> questions and concerns to the WG list before December 13, 2012. If
 >> you have no comments and you believe that the document is ready for
 >> submission to the IESG as a Standards Track document please send a
 >> short message as well to help us in determining the level of review
 >> and consensus.
 >
 >
 > I have some minor, primarily editorial, comments below, but in
 > general this looks okay.
 >
 > - should expand “TS” -> “MPEG Transport Stream” in the title

OK.

>
 >
 > - the first sentence of the Abstract could usefully be changed to “An
 > MPEG Transport Stream (TS) is a...”

I disagree: the sentence is not referring to a particular instance of 
TS, but to TS in general.  However, it might be useful to apply the same 
change here as you suggest for the title.

>
 >
 > - change “this draft” to “this memo” throughout

OK.

>
 >
 > - “occurances” -> “occurrences” in the Introduction

OK.

>
 >
 > - The packet diagram at the end of page 4 says “BT=TBD” but the text
 > at the top of page 5 says “...is identified by the constant <TDM>”.
 > These should be consistent, and should match the value in Section 5.

OK.

>
 >
 > - The description of SDP offer/answer usage in Section 4.2 is
 > insufficient, and needs to be updated in a manner analogous to the
 > other recent RTCP XR blocks.

Can you be more specific, please?

>
 >
 >