IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] Comments on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Tue, 16 October 2012 05:55 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C90921F88F8 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.450, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rYmSl4uK4Sd for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5828421F88F6 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AKQ33303; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:54:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:54:10 +0100
Received: from SZXEML409-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.136) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:54:56 +0100
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.136) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:54:53 +0800
Message-ID: <1B8BF8BB71E24906B07ADE49AC18ABC1@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
References: <1433318271.1001350361056459.JavaMail.hermes@ent-web6>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:54:53 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_040A_01CDABA5.D12C0910"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Comments on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:55:05 -0000

---- Original Message ----- 
    From: Claire Bi(jiayu) 
    To: xrblock 
    Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 4:02 PM 
    Subject: [xrblock] Comments on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec 


    Hi， 

    Several quick comments to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec: 

    1. Section 1.4 
    Editor Notes needed to be cleared. 
     
  [Qin]: To clear the Editor Note, we need firstly reach agreement that 
  this draft should also need to support packet loss concealment for video application. 
   
  [Claire]:OK. I have another question. Once this agreement is reached, is this metric still primarily for audio applications of RTP? If not, the abstract, section 1.1 and other related sections should also be upgraded. Maybe this also needs to be discussed in Atlanta. 
[Qin]: Good question. My understanding, these metrics are still primarily for audio application. However video loss concealment should also been supported.
I will propose some change soon to addresss this issue on the list.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email