[xrblock] no xrblock meeting at IETF 97

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Fri, 02 September 2016 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CC412B05E for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kx9YcG8LGVy for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C059128E19 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v123so121036662qkh.2 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cloa0mBEnNlTe/8EuPeVt13s3AVQf5XnWk51TlZKtdM=; b=gE3ojUbIOnm1mBS9dUbUP5xMieTTMFwOu/OaeWYjQXP2xfEZFHNxTyvB2W1wKk3Ely 6oKUi9RcPdRiT7hdYYXoOq2lfHalgKFR8RpJMsAmWmkMooEWo6n8U7DOob1a84Xefc7J GBIor6Q3607NhwTqFW2+1ZKxNp4EbOb4yg+7VP38lC3DBBtPdlx1UvF10LXW2173ovgo BqGja+eJ7tHeImYkfco/wCdSbnu4ruMe2zr+Ec7ybfEDDqhL7BqfqpgDqd52J3eQ9q5P uMA3THv53Jo9u+y+ucOh09iuyxpuA0KvQKCeDvWtTMU2pxB2q527CW9N0xgwfqQDfLgG HJKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cloa0mBEnNlTe/8EuPeVt13s3AVQf5XnWk51TlZKtdM=; b=BpnAwGmgsgoF5aVmbCvCkaCSq4OAb0xw4BqnS17VVN2ob+vXIFfDqacbLF+5jmWCqt cmTDg/d3b1E1CFKzJ3Tc5kKSV2NtQwQxPL6te2rP43BXDcw4V9l5sE+i0PTF9kRs65H4 uqLBBx9gE197UHfTh6RKjOqJ5o9wC5qsAt3gdi1pKnUL1+cYnEvqTrnxaNav07RgFKgD u1j/8N9sXAyX72ZURaQreqpPS59X/xzEoRiQNZOysqDh1KSlWbBN3A8EZoRtLcxDaMWj p8WzrDDXjPIAbRRxdfU33Hw82YKHE014p7P+JHkXeKbLN3PE05u4ybjrCHueLfvRpgCW WCFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNrZUvgcoHI+zBn8eKjt9d5hDRjkMybcEG7xJzUx3jXehVtJy6VllAnQs3iju1OTVUnbQNNBN1rHc+6kg==
X-Received: by 10.55.72.84 with SMTP id v81mr25456397qka.19.1472828333185; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.107.67 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 17:58:52 +0300
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4XHxqxe++fUU2pS0--chfMMLXT6u+OC_yG2FZV+tyY0Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: xrblock@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114880429d5e37053b8791fe
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/MdIoAYrRAcG239hTKP-LVUf5r9Q>
Subject: [xrblock] no xrblock meeting at IETF 97
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:58:56 -0000

XRBLOCK has currently two active documents in process.

- draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard-03
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard/>
is 'Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed'
- draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-03
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics/>
- is close to publication request (Shida is the document shepherd)

There is no new work AFAIK.

Does anybody believe that we need a meeting at IETF 97, or can we push the
'No Meeting' button?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan