Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02

Hi,
Sorry for the late posting.
I noticed that ETSI TR 101 290 has eight first priority and eight second
priority indications (section 5.2.1 and 5.2.2) while here we list only half
of them claiming that the others do not apply to all MPEG implementations. 

I do not have a major problem with keeping the XR block as is but we can
look at two other options.

1. Have all 16 indications.
2 Add two new parameters " # of First Priority Errors"  and   "# of Second
Priority Errors  "

Roni Even

-----Original Message-----
From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: 29 November, 2012 2:48 PM
To: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02

This is a Working Group Last Call for
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02.txt.  

Please read and review this document, and send your comments, questions and
concerns to the WG list before December 13, 2012. If you have no comments
and you believe that the document is ready for submission to the IESG as a
Standards Track document please send a short message as well to help us in
determining the level of review and consensus. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock