IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Wed, 12 December 2012 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B76F21F8BD5 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:07:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.613
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.613 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CYuE5yJQDdrg for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:07:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C6A21F8955 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AMK26634; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:06:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:05:57 +0000
Received: from SZXEML460-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.203) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:06:46 +0000
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml460-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:06:41 +0800
Message-ID: <B2EA72D743904C77BDC42AD1B9E9C61B@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA024828@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com><A9B61A34-690A-4F19-930E-CCBE3FC508CB@csperkins.org> <50C806FB.8050603@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:06:40 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-02
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:07:02 -0000

 >
 > - The description of SDP offer/answer usage in Section 4.2 is
 > insufficient, and needs to be updated in a manner analogous to the
 > other recent RTCP XR blocks.

Can you be more specific, please?

[Qin]: In my interpretation, the other recent RTCP XR blocks are referred to Burst gap loss draft
and Burst gap discard draft which get SDP Directorate review recently.
>
 >
 >


_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.9.2 | Report a Bug | By Email