[xrblock] [Errata Rejected] RFC6958 (4424)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 05 November 2015 08:51 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669801A008A; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 00:51:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DGRWEAkKHpxb; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 00:51:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172201A00D8; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 00:51:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E50CA180003; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 00:50:02 -0800 (PST)
To: varun.singh@iki.fi, alan.d.clark@telchemy.com, zhangyx@sttri.com.cn, zhaojing@sttri.com.cn, sunseawq@huawei.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20151105085002.E50CA180003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:50:02 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/OQRMBWrS-cgcrz73H-ja1Y70V2U>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: [xrblock] [Errata Rejected] RFC6958 (4424)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 08:51:08 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6958, "RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric Reporting". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6958&eid=4424 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Varun Singh <varun.singh@iki.fi> Date Reported: 2015-07-21 Rejected by: Alissa Cooper (IESG) Section: 3.1 Original Text ------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Packets Lost in Bursts | Total... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ...Packets Expected in Bursts | Number of Bursts | Sum of| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ...Squares of Burst Durations (ms-squared) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Corrected Text -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Packets Lost in Bursts | Total... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Packets Expected in Bursts | Number of Bursts | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sum of Squares of Burst Durations (ms-squared) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... | reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Notes ----- The packet format on Section 3.1 shows 12 bits, however section 3.2 defines the \\\\"Number of bursts\\\\" as a 16 bits length field. Relevant text from Section 3.2 pasted below: Number of Bursts: 16 bits The number of bursts in the period of the report (Interval or Cumulative). The measured value is an unsigned value. If the measured value exceeds 0xFFFD, the value 0xFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an over-range measurement. If the measurement is unavailable, the value 0xFFFF MUST be reported. --VERIFIER NOTES-- There is an error in the report. The reporter will report a new corrected errata. -------------------------------------- RFC6958 (draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-12) -------------------------------------- Title : RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric Reporting Publication Date : May 2013 Author(s) : A. Clark, S. Zhang, J. Zhao, Q. Wu, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Metric Blocks for use with RTCPs Extended Report Framework RAI Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [xrblock] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6958 (44… RFC Errata System
- Re: [xrblock] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6958… Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6958… Varun Singh
- [xrblock] [Errata Rejected] RFC6958 (4424) RFC Errata System