[xrblock] xrblock status, no meeting at IETF 100
Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Sat, 23 September 2017 09:34 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1FE1332D7 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 02:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rGlcv_pKJHAv for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 02:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com (mail-qt0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064161331B0 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 02:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id b1so3126135qtc.4 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 02:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OtVL7nA8ZhiE3byphOGD0PUnjiy97i9NYFdDmtTsEJo=; b=K2p1U7si583WvfIiQH/57BbRgrMGUXe2JyiqiNibf+1lfKAE6wNR7GZHMEIwJnGhHd PUsBw/b/VcAmDLr2wN0CDs1kAMuENusMQUMpac38i+emqtYGMfg995ZmPd2HWx56umQA 0klSYki4K9P4IS5c00bZwDzZNFqL2BlWOm8Ln29aZvF6ze9e+6/MdDSjXas0TTMDpTfe Pub7ylZQ3VkBwsmlp+l7fNwTbAq7g+OvE3KSlwpkdAbR9hUdFwHP6Kc9sDmnLVVhCpie NGjMSlyJF3nXCu3QBAN8eeZT+ziAFoYtnRpvYF1SpgjiWmMiDoZTzZLE7c2hkm9ui7n3 3xeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OtVL7nA8ZhiE3byphOGD0PUnjiy97i9NYFdDmtTsEJo=; b=jQ7o/CxOekDty5aipC5YkAzGnLNPvP2vF+SaUWbl14oyoGDit8lMRCnjG2X5tUfvuz RizCxGUdb7W/Fj7CwlLHT3n8em4uoamqMsiHRra1+/X1hEHyBIIUwSxe95Edfbimw0yF 9rW4ha5NBY3xUWoQKPXa1tgmCjPSzkVEroBuJQbL6YjYsFHkmf1bk66zP+hUPszZ2Ceo vi/dDF4jWShiBI8S4Obn0vi9z0aH0dnKAq3j6irjezC914B2QE0Ti+e8sJN5gUwiUHYa r9ZME1eef9Tgqpmhbp4R0OzyBsheEn0Pq5caYXHj/M+9BZTgxDXTWkrL/U/9PZGNqOeF DfCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjSfBStGvrAsIANtAo4DdQZ1UOMq6zalWt4be7AKvQsox98frMc SC1DnZY3NDcRarh/+PPbVSQayHrgTa/4Ksa8Z3Z5sw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAnPSu9VrbpnDh8LTWvLR7xsY3FMOBoepeZhYkvwSDIIk2gIb6/Z8xgW2mMoi2YnWJBqtlwHkHg00c287kAm9U=
X-Received: by 10.237.62.200 with SMTP id o8mr2711462qtf.294.1506159261877; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 02:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.35.242 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 02:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:34:21 +0300
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4UahmZ6Yju0LR1y_WvL3X2Ti-wiJVqRCDr_9P_PUZ3P_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: xrblock@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114151cac789480559d8075f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/P09fXs5WsKvCVZ0s11E3vdboFso>
Subject: [xrblock] xrblock status, no meeting at IETF 100
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:34:24 -0000
Hi, The publication request for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-06 was sent by Shida. This is the last deliverable in our current charter. With almost all our chartered work done, and no proposals or discussions on the list about new work, it looks like there is no need for the WG to meet at IETF 100. Does anybody have any concern about pushing the 'the WG will not meet' button at the IETF 100 request tool? Regards, Dan
- [xrblock] xrblock status, no meeting at IETF 100 Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] xrblock status, no meeting at IETF … Varun Singh
- Re: [xrblock] xrblock status, no meeting at IETF … Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] xrblock status, no meeting at IETF … Huangyihong (Rachel)