Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
"Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 07:56 UTC
Return-Path: <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6892A120726 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:56:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id er5ds7JOegie for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C2B120047 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 75C7C527A2AE1 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:56:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:56:42 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.231]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:56:37 +0800
From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
CC: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
Thread-Index: AQHTkq64Btv0VP8aL0ydNzReyTxYrqN/G/QA///fBQCAAInyEA==
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:56:36 +0000
Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C68A22A@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAFgnS4WpSVb8TybG+5ttowsxYc7zo2aqGVbg4TfXPJkNcfJ5PQ@mail.gmail.com> <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C68A1B3@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAFgnS4WC7fdktwL9NsKnrQUzW8B6ihhW-AyDyg4PVnPmGaNkHA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4WC7fdktwL9NsKnrQUzW8B6ihhW-AyDyg4PVnPmGaNkHA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.134.153.152]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C68A22Ankgeml513mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/QNY_6asYaNkMq8PYFEO8zo1hb_M>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:56:47 -0000
Hi Dan, Do you think it is possible to have a joint meeting with AVTcore or payload. I’m sure it is not just xr metrics, but also some basic RTCP metrics? And I don’t think it is sufficient to be only discussed in ippm because ippm just provide the way for metrics to register if required, but ippm doesn’t have RTP experts and hence cannot decide which RTP metrics should be registered. BTW, my colleagues also want to discuss effective loss index draft, I believe. BR, Rachel From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:dromasca@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 3:33 PM To: Huangyihong (Rachel) Cc: xrblock Subject: Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Hi Rachel, Do you believe that the WG needs to meet at IETF 101 or can we entertain this discussion on the mail list (and possibly ask for a slot in the IPPM meeting)? Thanks and Regards, Dan On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Huangyihong (Rachel) <rachel.huang@huawei.com<mailto:rachel.huang@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Dan, I think it’s better to discuss the ippm initial registries for xrblock metrics, if possible. BR, Rachel From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Dan Romascanu Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 7:55 PM To: xrblock Subject: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Hi, There has been little activity lately on the mail list, and I am not aware about any new proposals. It does not seem that there is any need for xrblock to meet at IETF 101. Please let know the WG mail list of any other opinions before Monday 1/29. If there are no requests or comments I will push the 'no meeting' button. Thanks and Regards, Dan
- [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Roni Even (A)