[xrblock] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 May 2018 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietf.org
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38E012D82F; Mon, 21 May 2018 12:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics@ietf.org, Shida Schubert <shida.at.ietf@gmail.com>, xrblock-chairs@ietf.org, shida.at.ietf@gmail.com, xrblock@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152693032470.23757.12749012281387776509.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 12:18:44 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/RDzpmsPsWbBSBFyi65OMO8MZqTA>
Subject: [xrblock] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 19:18:45 -0000

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks for producing this document.

I did have one comment (and I apologize in advance that this is a particular
hot button for me).

I understand that you can do things with these metrics that you can't do with
previous metrics, but I wish there was a clearer description of "if you want to
understand X, you should implement this metric" earlier in the document. The
impression the reader is left with, is "if you're doing RTCWeb, you should
implement this metric", but I'm guessing that at least some of these metrics
would be useful for people who weren't doing RTCWeb, but need to measure
something that people who are doing RTCWeb also need to measure, and if that's
true, a short section that helped them figure that out would be helpful.