Re: [xrblock] downref in draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-06.txt

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Wed, 16 January 2013 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C048821F8792 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:05:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.259, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R+Fo60b+A0rX for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC5721F8C06 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:05:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ANO96688; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:05:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:04:47 +0000
Received: from SZXEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.153) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:04:57 +0800
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by SZXEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:04:51 +0800
Message-ID: <1EAD17D4704049E4B6F40E532D8ED9B3@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, <xrblock@ietf.org>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0611E4@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com><197A785F37FE4581837C568980DE1830@china.huawei.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0619C9@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:04:50 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [xrblock] downref in draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-06.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:05:02 -0000

Done, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "Qin Wu" <bill.wu@huawei.com>om>; <xrblock@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [xrblock] downref in draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-06.txt


> Hi Qin,
> 
> Please submit an updated version with this change. 
> 
> If anybody sees a problem, please say. 
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Qin Wu [mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:04 AM
>> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); xrblock@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [xrblock] downref in draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-
>> decodability-06.txt
>> 
>> Good catch, I agree with your point.
>> I think it is more straightforward to change RFC6709 as Informationtive.
>> 
>> Regards!
>> -Qin
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
>> To: <xrblock@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:06 PM
>> Subject: [xrblock] downref in draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-
>> 06.txt
>> 
>> 
>> > Editors of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-06.txt,
>> >
>> > While preparing the write-up draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-
>> 06.txt for submission to the IESG I ran in a similar downref problem as
>> with the summary statistics I-D, probably introduced in the last rounds
>> of edits. [RFC6709] is now referred to as a Normative Reference, which
>> results in a downref, as 6709 is an Informational RFC. Can you also look
>> at this issue?
>> >
>> > Note that downrefs are OK, but we must be sure that this is what we
>> want to do, and call these explicitly in the write-ups, which will lead
>> to being called explicitly in the IETF Last Calls.
>> >
>> > My take as a contributor is that RFC 6709 provides a generic guidance
>> and as such the reference to it may be Informative, but other people may
>> have different opinions.
>> >
>> > Thanks and Regards,
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > xrblock mailing list
>> > xrblock@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
>> >
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock